Actualism


Also found in: Dictionary, Medical, Legal, Wikipedia.

actualism

[′ak·chü·ə‚liz·əm]
(geology)

Actualism

 

in geology, a method in the natural sciences for the study of the earth’s development. Actualism comes from the proposition that the “present is a key to the understanding of the past.” It is an integral part of the comparative historical method which has found wide application in geology. Actualism, based on the concepts of the interaction of the composition of mountain types, the specific aspects of the environment, and the dynamics of geological processes, permits science to utilize the data of present-day natural phenomena and the effects of their action for the purpose of inferring the nature of the ancient geological conditions in which rocks were formed. The term actualism appeared in the German geological literature during the second half of the 19th century and found widespread application during the 1920’s. Understanding of the concept changed over the years with changes in the approach to the connection of past and present.

The rudiments of actualism appeared at the earliest stages of human knowledge, in ancient myths, biblical passages, and the writings of the ancient naturalists. Actualism was later applied in the analysis of geological history, at first irrationally—in Middle Asia by Avicenna and al-Biruni, 10th-11th centuries, in Italy by Leonardo da Vinci, 15th—16th centuries, in Denmark by N. Steno, 18th century—and more systematically from the middle of the 18th century—for instance by M. V. Lomonosov in Russia and Hutton in Great Britain. Karl Hoff in Germany and particularly Charles Lyell in Great Britain made major contributions to the foundation and development of the method in the first half of the 19th century. The latter, however, having demonstrated the significance of actualism in the interpretation of geological history, used actualism as one of the elements of uniformitarianism, which arises from the concept of the immutability of the system of geological factors in time.

The error of these inferences was soon discovered, and since the end of the 19th century actualism has been applied to the study of the evolution of the earth and the constantly changing geological environment. Great contributions to the development of actualism have been made by Russian scientists like N. I. Andrusov, A. D. Arkhangelskii, and N. M. Strakhov, J. Walther in Germany, L. Cayeux in France, and others who confirmed the validity of actualism as a method and not as the fundamental principle of all geology.

Specialized discussions on the validity of using the term actualism, particularly in lithology, took place in Germany during the 1930’s and in the USSR during the 1950’s.

REFERENCES

Zhemchuzhnikov, Iu. A. “K voprosu o sovremennom sostoianii aktualisticheskogo metoda v litologii.” In Litologicheskii sbornik, issue 1. Leningrad-Moscow, 1948.
Strakhov, N. M. Osnovy istoricheskoi geologii, 3rd ed., part 1. Moscow-Leningrad, 1948.
Shatskii, N. S. [et al.] “K voprosu o periodichnosti osadkoobrazovaniia i o metode aktualizma ν geologii.” In the collection K voprosu o sostoianii nauki ob osadochnykh porodakh. Moscow, 1951.
Walther, J. Einleitung in die Geologie als historische Wissenschaft, parts 1–3. Jena, 1893–94.
Kaiser, E. “Der Grundsatz des Aktualismus in der Geologie.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 1931, vol. 83, fasc. 6.

V. V. TIKHOMIROV

References in periodicals archive ?
This aesthetic criterion, incorporating (A) and similar to Schlesinger's style of actualism, is the one I propose to defend here.
14) See, for two recent contributions to this literature, Jackson & Pargetter, Oughts, Options, and Actualism, 95 PHIL.
Emerson's notion of heroic is different from Carlyle's--and in ways that demonstrate the truth of Weisbuch's claims regarding American actualism.
The past decade saw a strong reversal of actualism in favour of a more complex vision of the climatic system.
Alvin Plantinga gave a reductio of the conjunction of the following three theses: Existentialism (that is, the view that the proposition "Socrates exists" cannot exist unless Socrates does), Serious Actualism (the view that nothing can have a property at a world without existing at that world) and Contingency (the view that some objects, like Socrates, exist only contingently).
The dispute between them is reminiscent of, but clearer than, the more familiar one between possibilism and actualism.
A fruitful starting point could be Godel's actualism, his conviction that all meaningful concepts pertain to one actual world, and that other possibilia, insofar as the existence of such unrealized worlds or states of affairs is at all needed, reduce to, or can be analyzed within, our world.
Vuillemin believes that the ancients explored, at least tentatively, all the possible strategies for resisting the Master Argument and, thus, the deterministic pressure of Diodoran actualism.