American Standard Code for Information Interchange: see ASCII ASCII or American Standard Code for Information Interchange, a set of codes used to represent letters, numbers, a few symbols, and control characters. Originally designed for teletype operations, it has found wide application in computers . ..... Click the link for more information. .
American Standard Code for Information InterchangeSee ASCII. American Standard Code for Information Interchange [ ə′mer·ə·kən ′stan·dərd ′kōd fər in·fər′mā·shən ′in·tər‚chānj] (communications) Coded character set to be used for the general interchange of information among information-processing systems, communications systems, and associated equipment; the standard code, comprising characters 0 through 127, includes control codes, upper- and lower-case letters, numerals, punctuation marks, and commonly used symbols; an additional set is known as extended ASCII. Abbreviated ASCII.
American Standard Code for Information Interchange - The basis of character sets used in almost all present-day
computers. US-ASCII uses only the lower seven bits
(character points 0 to 127) to convey some control codes,
space, numbers, most basic punctuation, and unaccented letters
a-z and A-Z. More modern coded character sets (e.g.,
Latin-1, Unicode) define extensions to ASCII for values
above 127 for conveying special Latin characters (like
accented characters, or German ess-tsett), characters from
non-Latin writing systems (e.g., Cyrillic, or Han characters), and such desirable glyphs as distinct open-
and close-quotation marks. ASCII replaced earlier systems
such as EBCDIC and Baudot, which used fewer bytes, but
were each broken in their own way.
Computers are much pickier about spelling than humans; thus,
hackers need to be very precise when talking about characters,
and have developed a considerable amount of verbal shorthand
for them. Every character has one or more names - some
formal, some concise, some silly.
Individual characters are listed in this dictionary with
alternative names from revision 2.3 of the Usenet ASCII
pronunciation guide in rough order of popularity, including
their official ITU-T names and the particularly silly names
introduced by INTERCAL.
See V ampersand, asterisk, back quote, backslash,
caret, colon, comma, commercial at, control-C,
dollar, dot, double quote, equals, exclamation mark,
greater than, hash, left bracket, left parenthesis,
less than, minus, parentheses, oblique stroke,
percent, plus, question mark, right brace, right brace, right bracket, right parenthesis, semicolon,
single quote, space, tilde, underscore, vertical bar, zero.
Some other common usages cause odd overlaps. The "#", "$",
">", and "&" characters, for example, are all pronounced "hex"
in different communities because various assemblers use them
as a prefix tag for hexadecimal constants (in particular,
"#" in many assembler-programming cultures, "$" in the 6502
world, ">" at Texas Instruments, and "&" on the BBC Micro,
Acorn Archimedes, Sinclair, and some Zilog Z80
machines). See also splat.
The inability of US-ASCII to correctly represent nearly any
language other than English became an obvious and intolerable
misfeature as computer use outside the US and UK became the
rule rather than the exception (see software rot). And so
national extensions to US-ASCII were developed, such as
Latin-1.
Hardware and software from the US still tends to embody the
assumption that US-ASCII is the universal character set and
that words of text consist entirely of byte values 65-90 and
97-122 (A-Z and a-z); this is a major irritant to people who
want to use a character set suited to their own languages.
Perversely, though, efforts to solve this problem by
proliferating sets of national characters produced an
evolutionary pressure (especially in protocol design, e.g.,
the URL standard) to stick to US-ASCII as a subset common
to all those in use, and therefore to stick to English as the
language encodable with the common subset of all the ASCII
dialects. This basic problem with having a multiplicity of
national character sets ended up being a prime justification
for Unicode, which was designed, ostensibly, to be the *one*
ASCII extension anyone will need.
A system is described as "eight-bit clean" if it doesn't
mangle text with byte values above 127, as some older systems
did.
See also ASCII character table, Yu-Shiang Whole Fish. | |
How to thank TFD for its existence? Tell a friend about us, add a link to this page, add the site to iGoogle, or visit webmaster's page for free fun content. |
|