Auxiliary Language


Also found in: Wikipedia.

Auxiliary Language

 

any artificial language used for special types of communication; distinct from natural language, which is the basic means of communication serving all spheres and types of human activity. Various codes and abstract languages of the intermediary-language type used in machine translation, as well as international auxiliary languages, which serve the purposes of international communication and are similar in function to natural languages, are regarded as auxiliary languages. The problem of an international auxiliary language is 300 years old; numerous plans exist for such a language (Esperanto, Volapuk, Ido, Occidental, Novial, and Interlingua). The following requirements are set forth for international auxiliary languages: simple, clear, and precise expression of existing concepts; the ability to express new concepts; simple and rational structure; motivated quality of the relationships between the signifier and the signified; and monosemy.

An auxiliary language may be constructed on the basis of a logical classification of concepts and a conventional system of expressing them (a priori language), or it may be modeled after existing languages and based on their lexical material (a posteriori language). Among the designs of international auxiliary languages there are also languages of the mixed type (for example, Esperanto) and truncated versions of existing natural languages (pidgin or Basic English). The creation of an international auxiliary language does not imply that it will replace all national languages; the auxiliary language will be used in international communications. The solution to the problem of the structure of an auxiliary language is closely associated with the problems of general linguistics. That branch of linguistics which studies the structural principles of auxiliary language design is known as inter linguistics. The problem of an international auxiliary language was discussed at the Sixth International Congress of Linguists in Paris in 1948. The International Auxiliary Language Association was formed in 1924.

REFERENCES

Akhmanova, O. S., and E. A. Bokarev. “Mezhdunarodnyi vspomogatel’nyi iazyk kak lingvisticheskaia problema.” Voprosy iazykoznaniia, 1956, no. 6.
Baudouin de Courtenay, I. A. “Vspomogatel’nyi mezhdunarodnyi iazyk. ” Izbr. trudy po obshchemu iazykoznaniiu, vol. 2. Moscow, 1963.
Grigor’ev, V. P. “O nekotorykh voprosakh interlingvistiki.” Voprosy iazykoznaniia, 1966, no. 1.
Drezen, E. K. Za vseobshchim iazykom (Tri veka iskanii). Mo scow-Leningrad, 1928.
Schuchardt, H. Weltsprache und Weltsprachen. Strasburg, 1894. Couturat, L., and L. Leau. Histoire de la langue universelle. Paris, 1907.
Baudouin de Courtenay, I. “Zur Kritik der kiinstlichen Weltsprachen.” In the collection Annalen der Naturphilosophie, vol. 6. Leipzig, 1907.
Jespersen, O. An International Language. London, 1928.
Jacob, H. A Planned Auxiliary Language. London, 1947. Martinet, A. “La Linguistique et les langues artificielles.” Word, 1946, no. 1.
Actes du sixieme congres international des linguistes. Paris, 1949.
International Auxiliary Language Association: Annual Reports for 1938. New York, 1939.

V. V. RASKIN

References in periodicals archive ?
useful as an International Auxiliary Language if it remained stable.
Esperanto is the most widely spoken international auxiliary language, which has been in continuous use for over 125 years.
35billion people who speak it as their first, second or auxiliary language.
If we take the idea of the Uralic languages originating in an auxiliary language, a lingua franca, as an example it is obvious that very little has actually been presented to support this idea, rather it is the idea itself that is constantly being put forward, not the evidence.
Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization to set up a commission to study the desirability of an independent, neutral and auxiliary language, and recommend its findings to the U.
According to Turgeon, the name Terocelo[TM] came from the universal auxiliary language created by L.
The book doesn't firmly distinguish among constructed languages, reconstructed languages, auxiliary languages, revived languages, private languages, universal languages, and fictional languages (not to mention the difference between fictive and discursive uses of language).

Full browser ?