Carpology

(redirected from Carpological)
Also found in: Dictionary.
Related to Carpological: Carphology

carpology

[kär′päl·ə·jē]
(botany)
The study of the morphology of fruit and seeds.

Carpology

 

the division of plant morphology studying the form and structure of fruits and seeds. Since the propagation of plants is made possible by various agents (wind, water, birds, mammals, and man) it is not sufficient to study only the morphological character of fruits and seeds (for example, the origin of the fruit from a specific part of the flower or the structure of seed and fruit coats). Ecological factors must also be taken into account. Carpology is basically the study of the morphogenesis and ontogenesis of fruits and seeds. A primary function of carpology is the establisment of a classification system. A morphological classification of fruits based on the consistency of the pericarp (dry and succulent fruits) and on the number of seeds in the fruit (single-seed or multiple-seed fruits) was worked out by the German botanist J. Gaertner. Russian scientists, including Kh. Ia. Gobi, developed his system further. Their classification takes several ecological factors into account, such as the method by which the fruit is opened. The most urgent tasks of carpology are the establishment of a convenient and detailed applied scientific classification of fruits and the categorization of the fruits and seeds of weeds. These classifications will greatly aid agronomists, seed developers, and workers in quarantine and seed quality-control laboratories.

REFERENCES

Kaden, N. N. “O nekotorykh osnovnykh voprosakh klassifikatsii, tipolo-gii i nomenklatury plodov.” Botanicheskiizhurnal, vol. 46, no. 4, 1961.
Takhtadzhian, A. L. Osnovy evoliutsionnoi morfologiipokrytosemennykh. Moscow-Leningrad, 1964.

L. V. KUDRIASHOV

References in periodicals archive ?
The lack of accurate modern carpological collections is a significant handicap to this process, as pointed out by Martinetto et al.
As most paleobotanists have had a limited access to modern carpological collections that mainly focus on their own countries or regions, they tend to name their samples as the most similar match they find in their reference collection.
Heer, 1855; Rochctte and Rivaz-Monod, Switzerland), but this name was not only used to refer to leaves (Gaudin & Delaharpe, 1856; Ettingshausen, 1866; Heer, 1869a) but also to carpological remains (see the correspondent epigraph in the checklist).
The main text of the checklist summarizes the data for each putative species known from carpological remains, as well as provides pertinent taxonomic comments on each taxon as a whole.
On the other hand a few carpological remains have been re-classified as belonging to other genera or families (see "Misidentifications" epigraph).
Kirchheimer (1957) in his revision of carpological remains from Central Europe also considered as doubtful remains those cited as Carex sp.
In our material the peat layer (Table 3) contains few species of plant macroremains, as only carpological finds were identified.
A special effort is needed to better understand the carpological variation within this group, which will permit a more confident approach to interpreting the fossil remains listed under this epigraph.
A new protocol for the collection and cataloguing of reference material for the study of fossil Cyperaceae fruits: The Modern Carpological Collection.
2016) Table 2 Localities where fossil carpological remains of Carex have been reported Reference/ GEOLOGICAL EPOCH Locality Age Taxa / names PALEOCENE Heer Firkanten Paleocene C.
The gcncsis of mass carpological deposits (bedload carpodeposits) in the Tertiary of the Lower Rhine Basin, Germany.