Differential Tariff

Differential Tariff


a type of customs duty with different rates for the same goods. Rates may be nominal, preferential, minimum, intermediate, or maximum. The last are also known as general rates.

The developed capitalist countries use differential tariffs as a tool for state-monopoly regulation of the economy and as a weapon of discrimination against other countries in international trade. For example, raw materials, especially petroleum, are imported at preferential or minimal rates, and in many cases they enter duty-free. This leads to reduced costs for the national refining industry. Nominal or intermediate rates are applied to imported semifinished products. However, in the interests of monopolies, which use these imports to manufacture and export finished goods, preferential rates may be used. Semifinished products may even enter duty-free; for example, a country that exports textiles may permit duty-free importing of yarns.

The imperialist powers generally set maximum rates for goods imported from the socialist countries. For example, in accordance with long-term agreements, in 1972 the duty on manganese ore imported by the United States from countries enjoying a preferential customs status was set at $0.0012 per pound (453 g) of manganese content, while the same ore was being imported from the USSR at a tariff rate of $0.01 per pound, that is, eight times as much. However, in the mid-1960’s the developed capitalist countries introduced more flexible differential tariffs in trade with certain socialist countries.

In the USSR, minimum and maximum rates have been established for imported goods. In conformity with the July 28, 1961, decree of the Council of Ministers of the USSR, the minimum rates apply to dutiable goods that originate in or are being imported from countries that give most-favored-nation status to Soviet goods. Maximum rates are applied to goods that originate in or are imported from countries that do not give Soviet goods such status or that have violated a trade agreement (see alsoMOST-FAVORED-NATION STATUS).


Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
He, however, excused the operators from the responsibility, saying: " We had proposed a differential tariff for messages beyond 200 per day, but it did not work out.
The Japanese pork market facing international trade; introducing a spatial equilibrium model of international trade under consideration of a differential tariff system.
In order to analyze how the exporting countries may respond to these two types of tariff treatments, it is assumed that country M has announced credibly whether it is going to impose a uniform tariff rate or differential tariff rates.
We wanted a differential tariff where consumers pay more for messages beyond 200 per day.
Roeh said the Israeli government compensated settlement businesses for losses incurred because of the differential tariffs, and he expected similar assistance for damage due to labeling regulations.
Eliminate the uniform tariff and gradually move toward the regulator's differential tariffs based on true costs.
The CIRC has taken measures to address these issues, such as introducing differential tariffs in certain provinces and enforcing acceptance of MTPL applications.
Despite the rifts within the banana industry, Frundt points to the growing ties between fair traders, unions, and NGOs and asserts that the divisions have provided "structural opportunities" for debate and discussion and the forming of "networks" upon which to build a sustainable banana alliance with a broader vision of fair trade, including a multi-stakeholder forum and proposed differential tariffs on the basis of social, environmental, and economic criteria.
Such a system of complex differential tariffs is just the kind of protectionism that governments have been working to eliminate since the start of the GATT process more than fifty years ago.
Other issues include the rules of origin and differential tariffs.
This politically difficult way is to keep some degree of globalisation, but to group poor countries together in similar customs unions (not mixed up with the most developed countries, as in ASEAN and NAFTA), to have differential tariffs decided by a UN body, favouring the poor peasant farmers of the poorer countries, and then (and only then) to industrialise parts of the weakest countries, selectively.
Under a single-column tariff schedule, a country levies the same duty on a product no matter its country-of-origin, while a double-column schedule allows differential tariffs rates on imports of the same product from different countries.

Full browser ?