Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi

Also found in: Wikipedia.

Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich


Born Jan. 25, 1743, in Düsseldorf; died Mar. 10, 1819, in Munich. German writer and idealist philosopher; a proponent of the philosophy of feeling and faith.

Jacobi, a friend of J. W. von Goethe and C. M. Wieland, was the author of the philosophical novels Edward Allwill’s Collected Letters (1775–76) and Woldemar (1779). He was president of the Bavarian Academy of Science from 1807 to 1812. In a dispute with M. Mendelssohn about B. Spinoza’s pantheism (1785), Jacobi opposed the “discursive” rationalism of the Enlightenment—of which, in his judgment, Spinozism was the classic example. According to Jacobi, “rational thought” is incapable of revealing the original and indisputable source of man’s individuality and its inherent freedom, and it leads inevitably either to naturalism, atheism, and determinism—as in Spinoza—or to Kant’s subjective idealism. Criticizing Kant, Jacobi revealed the basic contradiction in the latter’s theory: without the assumption of the thing-in-itself one cannot understand Kant’s philosophy, but one cannot retain this assumption and remain a Kantian.

Following D. Hume, Jacobi assumed that the actual existence of things is immediately given to man’s consciousness. The terms he used for this immediate authenticity were “faith,” “revelation,” and “feeling,” as well as “reason,” which he contrasted to “rationality.” For Jacobi, faith consisted of both the reality of the sensate world of earthly things and the reality of the absolute and eternal, where man feels that he is absorbed in the absolute and at the same time succeeds in retaining his original subjectivity.

To the Kantian categorical imperative, Jacobi opposed the individual’s moral autonomy rising above the rigorousness of moral commandments. He criticized J. G. Fichte, F. W. von Schelling, and G. Hegel, perceiving in the development of post-Kantian idealism certain tendencies toward pantheism and “nihilism” (a term that Jacobi himself introduced). Jacobi’s irrationalist philosophy anticipated many of the themes of the philosophy of life and of existentialism.


Neue Gesamtausgabe der Werke, des Nachlasses und des Briefwechsels (in 14 volumes). Darmstadt, 1968—.
In Russian translation:
“O transtsendental’nom idealizme.” In Novye idei v filosofii, sb. 12. St. Petersburg, 1914.


Kozhevnikov, V. A. Filosofiia chuvstva i very, part 1. Moscow, 1897.
Asmus, V. F. Problema intuitsii v filosofii i matematike, 2nd ed. Moscow, 1965.
Feuerbach, L. “Iakobi i filosofiia ego vremeni.” In his Istoriia filosofii, vol. 2. Moscow, 1967.
Lévy-Bruhl, L. La Philosophie de Jacobi. Paris, 1894.
Bollnow, O. F. Die Lebensphilosophie F. H. Jacobis. Stuttgart-Berlin, 1966.
Baum, G. Vernunft und Erkenntnis: Die Philosophie F. H. Jacobis. Bonn, 1969.


References in periodicals archive ?
Smith discusses the reception of Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz in the Spinoza-debate instigated by Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi and offers instructive remarks on Friedrich Schlegel's and Friedrich Schleiermacher's study of Leibniz and its traces in their early publications.
From his dissertation on Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi through his rediscovery of medieval and ancient political philosophy, according to Altman, Strauss opposed the public, exoteric rationalism and liberalism of the Enlightenment and esoterically endorsed a radical atheism, nihilism, and authoritarianism that he continued to carefully hide under the surface of his writings.
Thomas Wizenmann, el amigo de Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, en notas de su correspondencia y de sus legados postumos, asi como segun testimonios de contemporaneos.
En su afianzamiento resulto decisivo el encuentro, a los veinticuatro anos, con Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi.
Lo hizo a traves de uno de los actores de primera hora en el escenario de la primera difusion del kantismo: Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi (1743-1819).
In addition to a valuable introduction, Zank has divided the subject matter into the following topics: (1) Abstract of Strauss's dissertation on knowledge in Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, (2) Zionist Writings, (3) Writings on Spinoza, especially on his Biblical science, and (4) Reorientations, which include reviews of Freud, Rosenzwig, Ebbingham, and another comment on Spinoza.
It was Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi who posed this question, and by so doing lifted the interpretation of Spinoza--or what amounts to the same thing--the criticism of Spinoza on to its proper plane.
A renowned critic of the Enlightenment, Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi (1743-1819) singled out Spinoza as one of the main targets of his attacks.