George Herbert Mead

Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia.
Related to George Herbert Mead: Charles Horton Cooley

Mead, George Herbert


Born Feb. 27, 1863, in South Hadley, Mass.; died Apr. 4, 1931, in Chicago, III. American idealist philosopher and social psychologist.

Mead graduated from Harvard University, studied philosophy and psychology in Germany, and in 1894 became a professor at the University of Chicago. A follower of W. James and J. Dewey, Mead belonged, with Dewey, to the Chicago school, which elaborated the principles of pragmatism.

In the spirit of pragmatism, Mead viewed consciousness as the means by which an individual adapts to his environment; he considered the world of objects from the point of view of their importance to the behavior of the individual. The interaction of people in groups, according to Mead, gives rise to a world of artificial object symbols. In the process of socialization the individual masters the meanings of these symbols and with their help learns to direct his actions consciously, weaving them into a broader social act. The development of an individual into a mature personality is characterized by the increased ability to coordinate his own behavior with the actions of his partners and to assume the role allotted to him in the group. The structure of the human “I,” in Mead’s view, reflects the structure of the individual’s interactions in various groups. Society shapes the individual’s self-concept, entering within him, as it were, and guiding his actions along the proper lines. With the emergence of a developed “I” in the individual, the external social control is internalized and becomes self-control, as a result of which a person becomes a responsible individual capable of performing his or her role in the context of symbolic interactions of the group or of society as a whole.

Mead’s social theory influenced the subsequent study of the problems of personality, socialization, and social control and was the basis for the trend in social research called symbolic interactionism. The refusal to analyze the essential content of social interaction has limited the application of Mead’s theory to the study of direct interpsychological contacts, that is, to a sociopsychological approach to social phenomena. Therefore, attempts to present it as a general sociological theory, equally useful in describing interpersonal interaction and global processes, are unfounded.


The Philosophy of the Present. Chicago, 1932.
The Philosophy of the Act. Chicago, 1934.
Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago, 1934.
Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago, 1950.
The Social Psychology of George Herbert Mead. Edited by A. Strauss. Chicago, 1956.
Selected Writings. New York, 1964.


Kon, I. S., and D. N. Shalin. “D. G. Mid i problema chelovecheskogo la.” Voprosy filosofii, no. 12, 1969.


References in periodicals archive ?
Herbert Blumer e um dos principais autores da Escola de Chicago, responsavel pela continuidade do pensamento dos fundadores, particularmente de George Herbert Mead, de quem foi discipulo, e influenciando alunos notaveis, como Howard Becker e Erving Goffman.
He draws on classic American sociologists and psychologists, like Erving Goffman, George Herbert Mead and William James.
of California-Riverside) examines 100 years of sociological theorizing, from 1830 to 1930, through the ideas of seven thinkers: August Comte, Herbert Spencer, Karl Marx, Max Weber, Georg Simmel, Aemile Durkheim, and George Herbert Mead.
Marx, Durkheim, and Weber lead the list; others include George Herbert Mead, Erving Goffman, and Niklas Luhmann.
Coverage encompasses Ibn Khaldun, Auguste Comte, Harriet Martineau, Alexis de Tocqueville, Karl Marx, Herbert Spencer, Thorsten Veblen, Georg Simmel, Emile Durkheim, Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Max Weber, George Herbert Mead, William Edward Burghardt Du Bois, Joseph A.
Many of the articles dwell on the work of early sociologist George Herbert Mead.
He adopts a symbolic interactionist approach rooted in the work of George Herbert Mead and also incorporates theoretical insights from the Frankfurt School as epitomized by Jurgen Habermas in order to discuss the structural and global contexts of human learning, globalization and the knowledge society, and the changing nature of continuing education research and policy.
Using empirical evidence and armed with symbolic interactionism as explored by John Dewey, William James, Charles Pierce, Charles Copley and George Herbert Mead, contributors explore the sociology of the body in terms of its reflexivity, drama, phenomenology, place in the culture, and function as a form of narrative.
Using concepts of symbolic interaction that have evolved from the works of Jane Addams and George Herbert Mead, Hewitt (English, U.
discuss these issues with reference to Comte, Martineau, Marx, Herbert Spencer, Durkheim, Simmel, Weber, George Herbert Mead, Jane Addams and Du Bois.