Gideon v. Wainwright

Also found in: Legal, Wikipedia.

Gideon v. Wainwright,

case decided in 1963 by the U.S. Supreme Court. Clarence Earl Gideon was convicted of a felony in a Florida court. He had defended himself after being denied a request for free counsel. The Supreme Court, in overturning his conviction, held that the right to counsel, guaranteed in federal trials by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, is fundamental to a fair trial. State failure to provide counsel for a defendant charged with a felony violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth AmendmentFourteenth Amendment,
addition to the U.S. Constitution, adopted 1868. The amendment comprises five sections. Section 1

Section 1 of the amendment declares that all persons born or naturalized in the United States are American citizens and citizens of their state
..... Click the link for more information.
 to the Constitution. The decision was one of many by the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren that protected the rights of accused criminals and extended the guarantees in the Bill of Rights to state actions. The holding was expanded in 1972 to require counsel for any defendant who would spend even one day in jail if found guilty.


See A. Lewis, Gideon's Trumpet (1964).

Gideon v. Wainwright

established right of all defendants to counsel (1963). [Am. Hist.: Van Doren, 585]
See: Justice
References in periodicals archive ?
The soaring rhetoric of the Supreme Court in Gideon v.
NLADA recognized Hogan Lovells lawyers for devoting considerable time and resources to delivering on the mandate of Gideon v.
In this in-depth yet accessible exploration, Houppert (MA in Writing Program, Johns Hopkins University) analyzes Gideon v.
The occasion for the film is the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court's Gideon v.
doctrinal groundwork for a unanimous decision in Gideon v.
I did not receive a response, but when the opinion was released in March, the name of the case had been changed to Gideon v.