Glossematics


Also found in: Dictionary, Wikipedia.
Related to Glossematics: Louis Trolle Hjelmslev

Glossematics

 

a linguistic theory that arose among a group of Danish linguists at the University of Copenhagen in the mid-1930’s. Glossematics was devised by L. Hjelmslev in collaboration with V. Brøndal (1887-1942) and H. Uldall (1907-57). Refusing in principle to deal with epistemological problems (which shows the influence of the philosophy of logical positivism), the authors set for themselves the goal of devising a method whereby linguistic phenomena could be described without contradictions, exhaustively and with the utmost simplicity (the principle of empiricism). Glossematics also displays a similarity to the ideas of F. de Saussure. Adherents of glossematics take the subject of the study of linguistics to be the inherent structure of language, which is understood as a network of dependencies between linguistic elements on the levels of expression and content of language, as well as between both levels. Glossematics is oriented toward the structural-semiotic aspect of language and is abstracted from all of its other aspects—social, biological, physical, psychological, and so on—which are supposedly not associated with the “autonomous essence” of language. In addition, the material elements of language are held to be nonessential, the sound systems of natural human languages fall into the same category with such systems as nautical signaling and Morse code, differing from them only in their universality and wealth of combinational possibilities, and linguistics is taken to be a part of semiotics—the general science of sign systems.

The methodology of linguistic analysis as propounded by glossematics is characterized as deduction (movement from a class to a segment). It must lead to the establishment of a system that is the basis of the text being analyzed. For this purpose the initial data—a whole (undifferentiated) text—is successively broken down into smaller and smaller parts: periodic sentences, phrases, words, syllables, and phonemes. Commutation is the principal method of establishing the units at each stage of the analysis. Figurae of content and expression constitute the limit of analysis on each level of language. They are single-level units and nonsigns that cannot be divided further and from whose finite number is constructed an infinite number of signs having both content and expression aspects (Russian mal’chik “boy” includes six figurae of expression—[mal’ĉik]—and three figurae of content: animate being + masculine + youthfulness). The second and most important stage of analysis is the recording of functions among the units of language—that is, the determination of linguistic structure in the glossematic sense. Hjelmslev created a classification of functions based on the concept of constants, which do not depend on other values, and variables, which are conditioned by other values: interdependence (a function between two constants), determination (a function between a constant and a variable), and constellation (a function between two variables). After computing all possible relations and dependencies between units of a language by means of a mathematical operation and after verifying which of the possibilities permissible by a general calculation are realized in one or another concrete language, it is possible to construct a typological classification. Where a formal analysis and description of linguistic phenomena, which proceed from their interdependencies, are required, glossematics yields fruitful results. However, it by no means exhausts the essential features of language.

REFERENCES

Hjelmslev, L. “Metod strukturnogo analiza v lingvistike.” In V. A. Zvegintsev, Istoriia iazykoznaniia XIX i XX vekov v ocherkakh i izvlecheniiakh, part 2, Moscow, 1960.
Hjelmslev, L. “Prolegomeny k teorii iazyka.” In the collection Novoe v lingvistike, issue 1. Moscow, 1960.
Uldall, H. “Osnovy glossematiki.” In the collection Novoe v lingvistike, issue 1. Moscow, 1960.
Spang-Hanssen, H. “Glossematika.” In the collection Novoe v lingvistike, issue 4. Moscow, 1965.

V. P. MURAT

References in periodicals archive ?
His influence is seen of course in the work of other linguists, especially in Roman Jakobson's distinctive features (Joseph 71, Falk 115) and six functions of language (Hutchings 147-8, Bouissac 245) and in Louis Hjelmslev's glossematics (Bouissac 243, 247), whether or not these always agree with Saussure's positions.
It may be true that Jacobsen was not a follower of glossematics, but he did admire Hjemslev and made much use of the latter's La Categorie des cas: Etude de grammaire generale (1935), which is crucial for the understanding of his work on the Sumerian verb.
In order rigorously to dissociate signifier and signified from one another and thereby refute the phonic basis of language, Derrida incorporates into his theory the glossematics of Louis Hjelmslev wherein expression versus content, each with its form and its substance, is substituted for the Saussurean dichotomy.