Instead, what it put me in mind of was Godwin's law
- the theory that all online discussions eventually invoke Adolf Hitler - and for which, in this case, one may substitute Trump.
Everyone knows what the last comparable economic crisis did to Europe in the 1930s, and you don't have to succumb to Godwin's law
to see that political turmoil doesn't just happen like the tide coming in.
TIME for a quick refresher in the internet rule known as Godwin's Law
, which serves to dissuade people from comparing anything they don't like to Hitler or the Nazis.
states the longer an online conversation grows, the greater the chances of someone mentioning Hitler becomes.
In 1990 an American lawyer called Mike Godwin produced a maxim that is now contained in the Oxford English Dictionary, appearing as Godwin's Law
The real life version of Godwin's law
was confirmed so long ago in this election cycle that it might as well have included a Godse corollary.
I searched in vain for an example of Godwin's Law
, but no one had used the phrase Food Nazi, or at least not yet.
Coun Mullaney may not be aware of a tradition among internet-users known as Godwin's Law
- the first person to mention the Nazis in an argument is automatically deemed to have lost it.
frequently digress toward Godwin's Law
and certainly Benford's Law, sometimes simultaneously.
A corollary to Godwin's Law
is the well-known tradition in the Internet's Usenet newsgroups that once a person in a discussion thread invokes the comparison to Hitler or the Nazis, the thread is ended and the person who made the comparison has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress.
Jokers will appreciate such entries as HTCPCP, a joke format dreamt up as an April Fools Day joke, while historians will appreciate learning about Godwin's Law
But those familiar with Godwin's Law
("as an on-line discussion grows larger, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one") might rather see this laughable exchange more as a product of Internet anthropology than of Afghan anthropology Again, Edwards's argument is neither profound nor explicit enough to be conclusively proven.