Hague Conventions

(redirected from Hague Convention)
Also found in: Medical, Legal, Acronyms, Wikipedia.

Hague Conventions

 

(1) International conventions on the laws and customs of war accepted at the first and second world conferences at The Hague in 1899 (convened upon the initiative of Russia) and 1907.

The first Hague Conference of 1899 (27 states participating, among them Great Britain, the USA, Germany, France, Italy, the Scandinavian countries, and Japan) accepted three conventions—the peaceful resolution of international conflicts, the laws and customs of land warfare, and the application of the principles of the Geneva Convention of Aug. 10, 1864, to naval warfare. It also adopted three declarations—a five-year prohibition against throwing projectiles and explosives from balloons or ejecting them with the aid of similar new techniques, the nonuse of projectiles designed only for the diffusion of asphyxiating and harmful gases, and the nonuse of bullets that easily turn or flatten out in the human body. The convention on the peaceful resolution of international conflicts had particular significance, because by this convention states agreed to exert all efforts to safeguard the peaceful resolution of international disagreements. The convention also noted the major instruments to achieve this purpose: good offices and mediation, international investigative commissions, and an international treaty court.

Some 44 states took part in the work of the second Hague Convention of 1907 (all the participants of the 1899 Conference plus 17 states of South and Central America). The conference accepted 13 conventions: the peaceful resolution of international conflicts, the limitation of the use of feree in the collecting of debts in treaty obligations, the commencement of military operations, the laws and customs of land warfare, the rights and obligations of neutral states and persons in the event of ground war, the situation of enemy commercial vessels on the commencement of military operations, the conversion of commercial vessels into warships, the placing of underwater automatically exploding contact mines (this convention has lost its significance), naval bombardment in wartime, the application of the principles of the Geneva Convention to naval warfare (later replaced by the Geneva Convention of 1949), several limitations on the right of seizure in naval warfare, the establishment of an international prize court (this convention did not become effective), and the rights and obligations of neutral states in event of war. In addition, a declaration on the prohibition against throwing projectiles and explosives from balloons was accepted.

The Hague conventions played a significant role in the cause to regulate the rules of warfare in international law. Although the Hague conventions reflected the level of military techniques of that period (late 19th and early 20th centuries), their meaning has been preserved and defined because they are based on the progressive principle of the humanization of warfare.

The USSR recognized the Hague conventions that were earlier ratified by the prerevolutionary government to the degree that they do not contradict the Charter of the United Nations and in consideration of the changes introduced into them by later international agreements in which the USSR took part.

(2) Conventions on international private law of 1902-05, 1951, and 1956. The Hague Convention of 1902-05 (on marriage, divorce, and court separation of spouses, guardianship of minors, trusteeship of minors, personal and property relations between spouses, and international civil trial) were ratified only by several European countries and did not have great significance; their effectiveness ceased with the out-break of World War I. The Hague conventions of 1951 and 1956 were not widespread. The USSR was not a participant in this group of conventions.

REFERENCE

Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: Uchebnik. Moscow, 1964. Chapter 15, pp. 634-62.
V. I. KUZNETSOV
References in periodicals archive ?
The opening words of the 1993 Hague Convention marked a significant change in the international view of what constitutes the best interest of the child, deeming placement in 'a family environment' the highest priority.
Barfield, Watson, and other Holland & Knight attorneys nationwide participate in a monthly conference call to discuss opportunities that come up through the Hague Convention.
Before any of these issues can be explored further, it is necessary to first, by way of background, trace the development of the Hague Convention (discussed in Part 1 of this article).
The Act precisely defines the proceedings with applications for the transfer of a child abroad, resulting from the Hague Convention.
While ratifying Hague, Pakistan has ensured that it will apply to the whole territory of Pakistan and confirmed in its acceding statement that the Hague Convention is a state specific multi-lateral commitment.
Besides, India becoming a signatory to The Hague Convention will also not benefit its own citizens because instances of Indian children being taken away from India to a foreign country by either one of the child's parents are few and far between.
Rebuilding the Dichotomy, but Adding Protection During Non-International Armed Conflicts: The 1954 Hague Convention
The proposed theory on natural-born citizenship by legal fiction is tenuous simply because it is hinged on the retroactive application of Article 2 of the 1961 Hague Convention that came into force only in 1975 as a curative measure in an otherwise imperfect citizenship claimed under the 1935 Constitution.
Often, civil aspects relating to international child abduction provided by the Hague Convention and transposed into national legislations of the Contracting States (as we have seen and concerning our legislation) are confused with criminal aspects regulated by the domestic laws in each State.
The court ultimately concluded that the children's habitual residence for Hague Convention purposes at the time of their retention in the United States was Italy; that the retention was in breach of Ermini's custody rights under the law of Italy; and that Ermini was exercising those rights at the time of the children's retention in the United States.
1) The United Nations created the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (Hague Convention) in response to growing concerns over child abductions, the difficulty in locating the abducted child, and the constant struggle of conflicting judicial implementation and foreign enforcement.