tort

(redirected from Intentional tort)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Financial, Wikipedia.
Related to Intentional tort: Unintentional Tort

tort,

in law, the violation of some duty clearly set by law, not by a specific agreement between two parties, as in breach of contractcontract,
in law, a promise, enforceable by law, to perform or to refrain from performing some specified act. In a general sense, all civil obligations fall under tort or contract law.
..... Click the link for more information.
. When such a duty is breached, the injured party has the right to institute suit for compensatory damagesdamages,
money award that the judgment of a court requires the defendant in a suit to pay to the plaintiff as compensation for the loss or injury inflicted. Damages are the form of legal redress most commonly sought.
..... Click the link for more information.
. Certain torts, such as nuisancenuisance,
in law, an act that, without legal justification, interferes with safety, comfort, or the use of property. A private nuisance (e.g., erecting a wall that shuts off a neighbor's light) is one that affects one or a few persons, while a public nuisance (e.g.
..... Click the link for more information.
, may be suppressed by injunctioninjunction,
in law, order of a court directing a party to perform a certain act or to refrain from an act or acts. The injunction, which developed as the main remedy in equity, is used especially where money damages would not satisfy a plaintiff's claim, or to protect personal
..... Click the link for more information.
. Many crimes are also torts; burglary, for instance, often constitutes trespasstrespass,
in law, any physical injury to the person or to property. In English common law the action of trespass first developed (13th cent.) to afford a remedy for injuries to property.
..... Click the link for more information.
.

The history of Anglo-American tort law can be traced back to the action for trespass to property or to the person. Not until the late 18th cent. was the currently observed distinction made between injury willfully inflicted and that which is unintentional. In the early 19th cent., negligencenegligence,
in law, especially tort law, the breach of an obligation (duty) to act with care, or the failure to act as a reasonable and prudent person would under similar circumstances.
..... Click the link for more information.
 was distinguished as a separate tort, and it has come to supply a large portion of tortious litigation.

The general tendency today is to rule that the breach of any duty constitutes a tort, rather than to rule that an alleged tort must fit into some previously recognized variety, such as assault, false imprisonment, or libel. Some courts treat any willful unjustified injury as tortious, while others hold that the act must be defined as tortious by law, regardless of the perpetrator's motive. Torts that injure reputation or feelings are personal torts; those violating statutory rights are constitutional torts; those involving real or personal property are property torts. Property torts include several classes of torts, such as automobile accidents, negligence, product liability, and medical malpracticemalpractice,
failure to provide professional services with the skill usually exhibited by responsible and careful members of the profession, resulting in injury, loss, or damage to the party contracting those services.
..... Click the link for more information.
.

In some areas, tort liabilityliability,
in law, an obligation of one party to another, usually to compensate financially. It is a fundamental aspect of tort law, although liability may also arise from duties entered into by special agreement, as in a contract or in the carrying out of a fiduciary duty.
..... Click the link for more information.
 can be assigned without a finding of fault, as in no-fault automobile insurance. In areas where the finding of fault remains crucial, and the awards of compensatory or punitive damages can be substantial, tort litigation can be time-consuming and costly. Its defenders claim tort litigation promotes safety and economic efficiency, while critics argue the process does little but raise insurance premiums while providing windfalls to a handful of lawyers. Efforts to reform tort law hope to set limits to damage settlements and to broaden no-fault statutes for use in alternative forms of litigation. In the 1990s many U.S. states, pressed chiefly by conservatives and business interests, passed laws limiting damages, but state courts have repeatedly voided these limits as violations of "open courts" guarantees in state constitutions.

tort

Law a civil wrong arising from an act or failure to act, independently of any contract, for which an action for personal injury or property damages may be brought
References in periodicals archive ?
They covered a broader range of intentional torts to persons or personal property recognized at common law.
Another potential analogical intentional tort privilege that might be of interest to annoyancetech tort defendants is the privilege of citizen arrest.
28) At common law, the intent element of intentional torts is met by the defendant's desire to cause the harm or belief with substantial certainty that harm will result.
170) Third, in intentional tort cases, "the defendant's wrongful conduct is closely linked--temporally and conceptually--to the plaintiff's harm.
American tort law has traditionally declared that mental disability is no defense to negligent or intentional torts by holding the mentally disabled to an objective, reasonable person standard.
This Supreme Court decision, together with earlier opinions from Florida appellate courts, definitively distinguishes fraudulent transfers from the intentional tort of common law fraud.
To date, only one federal appellate court has considered whether the establishment in FIRREA of a federal cause of action for gross negligence and intentional tort pre-empts suits under state law for ordinary negligence.
It is an intentional tort distinguished by (1) deliberate, unlawful conduct in the exercise of public functions; and (2) awareness that the conduct is unlawful and likely to injure the plaintiff .
THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA HELD THAT THE PLAINTIFFS' ALLEGATIONS OF INTENTIONAL TORT PRECLUDED ANY WORKERS COMPENSATION IMMUNITY DEFENSE.
29) Proof of an intentional tort thus requires evidence of the actor's subjective mindset.
The plaintiffs, who had alleged health effects from exposure to beryllium particulate, sought recovery under negligence, intentional tort and various other legal theories.