Johann Georg Hamann


Also found in: Wikipedia.

Hamann, Johann Georg

 

Born Aug. 27, 1730, in Königsberg; died June 21, 1788, in Münster. German philosopher, critic, and writer.

Hamann studied philosophy, theology, and philology in Konigsberg. His Sibylline Letters (published, 1819) are written in the form of oracular pronouncements. He was called the “Magus of the North” for his obscure style and his aphorisms, reminiscent of prophesies. His autobiography, Thoughts on the Course of My Life (1758), contains mystic meditations on the meaning of the Bible and especially the book of Ecclesiastes. Unlike proponents of the Enlightenment, Hamann regarded artistic creation as an unconscious process.

In philosophy Hamann was an adherent of the theory of immediate knowledge. Criticizing the rationalism of the Enlightenment, especially the philosophy of Kant (Metacritique of the Purism of Reason, 1784; published, 1800), Hamann developed a mystically colored intuitive dialectic. Rejecting the rationalistic method of thinking, Hamann revived the notion of the coincidence of opposites as the general law of being. He stressed the role of emotion and form in poetry, which he considered to be the original language of the human race, predating prose. His works on language, poetry, and aesthetics contain polemics against the language theory of J. G. Herder. Hamann influenced the German literary trend of Sturm und Drang and the philosophical and aesthetic ideas of German romanticism.

WORKS

Sämtliche Werke, vols. 1-6. A historical and critical edition by J. Nadler. Vienna, 1949-57.
Hauptschriften [vols. 2, 5, 7]. Edited by F. Blanke and L. Schreiner. Gütersloh, 1956-62.

REFERENCES

Kozhevnikov, V. A. Filosofiia chuvstva i very v ee otnosheniakh k literature i ratsionalizmu 18 v. i k kriticheskoi filosofii, part 1. Moscow, 1897.
Asmus, V. F. Problema intuitsii v filosofii i matematike, 2nd ed. Moscow, 1965.
Unger, R. Hamann und die Aufklärung, 2nd ed., vols. 1-2. Halle, 1925.
Metzke, E. J. G. Hamanns Stellung in der Philosophic des 18. Jahrhunderts. Halle, 1934.

N. P. BANNIKOVA, R. M. BASKINA, and G. M. FRIDLENDER

References in periodicals archive ?
This volume collects two essays written by philosopher and political theorist Isaiah Berlin (1909-1997) on three figures of the Counter-Enlightenment (although that characterization has more recently been disputed): Giambattista Vico (1668-1744) and Johann Gottfried Herder (1744-1803) in the first essay and Johann Georg Hamann (1730-1788) in the second.
Betz undertakes two projects: first, he has produced the best and fullest survey of the life and writings of Johann Georg Hamann in a generation, helpfully including many passages from Hamann's letters and publications and commenting intelligently on the style, theology, philosophy, and (to a lesser extent) historical context of Haman's notoriously obscure oeuvre; second, he has written an intellectual history covering Hamann's relation to the major figures of his time as well as his subsequent influence on and reception by philosophers and theologians down to our own day.
s use of the work of Johann Georg Hamann, an important contemporary and critic of Kant.
Chapter 3 looks at five "dissenters," Christians who have rejected the Enlightenment Project of the neutrality and objectivity of reason and therefore of science: Blaise Pascal, Johann Georg Hamann, Charles Hodge, Abraham Kuyper, and Herman Dooyeweerd.
set to a text by Johann Georg Hamann, is a much more extensive work, scored like the oratorio with the important addition of a martial drum (oddly, the list of instruments that precedes the score on p.
A contemporary in dissent; Johann Georg Hamann as a radical enlightener.
who at age 21 had his own academic chair, is today known mostly as the one-time teacher of Immanuel Kant and Johann Georg Hamann.
While Konigsberg was certainly no London, Paris, or even Berlin, it did have a number of thinkers who were of great importance in the German philosophical scene and who played a significant role in the life of Kant: for example, Johann Georg Hamann, Theodor Gottlieb von Hippel, Johann Gottfried von Herder, and Marcus Herz.
The writing of Johann Georg Hamann (1730-1788) has fascinated, frustrated and baffled readers since its first publication.
This has important consequences if one takes Fichte's essay on language to be a response to the powerful "metacriticism" (Metakritik) levelled by Johann Georg Hamann against Kant's critical philosophy.