(in Tibetan, “words, speeches”), a sacred book of Buddhism, a collection of canonic works attributed to the Buddha. The Kagyur was translated into Mongolian from Tibetan during the rule of Ligdan Khan (1604-34). The Mongolian edition has 108 volumes including 1,161 works (tantra, sutra, and so forth), prose and poetry on different subjects (such as Buddha’s conversations with his pupils on morals and philosophy, mainly in the form of parables or didactic stories, and the collection An Ocean of Parables).The Kagyur is a kind of Buddhist encyclopedia.


Kovalevskii, O. M. “More pritch.” Uch. zap. Imperatorskogo Kazanskogo un-ta, 1834, nos. 1-2.
Pozdneev, A. M. Urginskie Khutukhty. St. Petersburg, 1880.
Ligeti, L. Catalogue du Kanjur Mongol imprimé, vol. 1. Budapest, 1942-44.


Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
There are copies of Peking Red print edition of the Tibetan Kagyur preserved outside China in Otani Univeristy, Kyoto, Japan; Harvard Yenching Institute, Boston, U.
The Peking edition of Kagyur preserved in Otani University was reprinted by photo offset in book form by the Suzuki Foundation in between 1955-61 and made it available to the world academic communities.
In the summer of 2008, three organizations namely National Library of Mongolia, The Asian Classics Input Project and Yuishoji Buddhist Cultural Exchange Research Institute jointly completed the project of scanning the Peking edition of Kagyur preserved in National Library of Mongolia.
In the earlier edition of Yongle and Wangli, each section of the Kagyur is numbered separately starting with letter Ka.
lCyang skya Ngag dbang mchog ldan (1642-1714) writes that "although there are several manuscript copies of the Kagyur in the dGon lung byamspa gling monastery, but there is no clear and printed edition.
There were several editions of Tibetan Kagyur printed in Peking during the reign of Emperor Kh'ang-hsi (r.
Our primary investigation of Peking Kagyur preserved in Ulan Bator, comparing with Otani, few volumes from Ulan Ude and Harvard copy suggests that the Ulan Bator copy is a contamination of two editions.
Other editions of Kagyur such as sTog, Ulan Bator Them spang ma, Phug brag and even the Narthang xylographic edition supports this reading with omission.
These corrections and changes in support of Derge disapprove the conviction that the Tshal pa Kagyur was the primary source for Peking editions of Kagyur.
It is evident that old blocks of 8 folios retained with the new blocks were also printed when a copy of the Kagyur is made.
and ends with 'byung ba ma lus ston par byed/ The Phug brag manuscript Kagyur rGyud-Ka, 211b5 also omits these two lines and supports the reading of Harvard copy with the omission of two lines.
Other popular editions of Tibetan Kagyur such as Derge, Narthang, sTog and Ulan Bator Them spangs ma includes slightly varied reading.