Linguistic System

System, Linguistic

 

(1) A set of units at a given linguistic level, such as the phonological, morphological, or syntactic level, taken in their unity and interrelatedness; the classes of units and the rules for the formation, transformation, and combination of such units. In this sense, one may speak of the phonological, morphological, derivational, syntactic, lexical, and semantic systems of a given language or, more narrowly, of the systems or subsystems of declension and conjugation, verb and noun, aspect and tense, gender and case, and so on. The definition of a language as a system is credited to F. de Saussure and was grounded in the writings of W. von Humboldt and I. A. Baudouin de Courtenay.

A distinction is made between a system’s core, which contains basic linguistic units and rules, and the periphery, which comprises little-used items, such as archaisms, slang, and dialectalisms on the border between the literary and the nonliterary language. A distinction is also made between the core and the periphery of a grammatical system. A language is sometimes defined as a system of systems (or of subsystems) with regard to the functional-stylistic stratification of a language into colloquial, official, journalistic, scholarly, and other strata and with regard to the fundamental acceptability of the noncoincidence of norms in the language’s various styles.

(2) A set of oppositions at a given linguistic level. Phonological facts may be described by means of distinctive features. More complicated metalanguages are required to describe morphological, syntactic, and lexical-semantic facts. Therefore, modern linguistics also uses a more general concept and defines a linguistic system as the property of the set of facts on a given level that permits the exhaustive and nonredundant description of all essential facts, preferably by means of a metalanguage that is simpler and more economical than the natural language being studied. The higher the degree of systematic organization of facts, the greater the dependence of the facts on each other. In well-organized systems, a substantial change in one fact, whether it be a lexical unit or a rule, entails a change in many other facts or even a fundamental reorganization of the entire set of facts.

REFERENCES

Saussure, F. de. Kurs obshchei lingvistiki. Moscow, 1933. (Translated from French.)
Hjelmslev, L. “Iazyk i rech’.” In V. A. Zvegintsev, Istoriia iazykoznaniia 19–20 vv. v ocherkakh i izvlecheniiakh, 3rd ed., part 2. Moscow, 1965.
Bondarko, A. V. Grammaticheskaia kategoriia i kontekst. Leningrad, 1971.
References in periodicals archive ?
To reiterate, I am not familiar with any other linguistic system in which, as in English and French, the way you pronounce a word is always likely to contradict the way you write it, and gratingly.
A foundational goal of linguistics is to distil a set of principles explaining the shared features of our languages by appealing to properties of the human cognitive and linguistic system.
We meet the phenomenally gifted fifth century mathematician Aryabhata and the genius Panini who, in the fourth century BCE, created the 'most complete linguistic system in history.
8 This adds to the fact that the literary traditions of this linguistic system are really limited and although it has a dictionary and a written grammar that is not to say that its written manifestations are abundant.
He shows the importance of internal constraints on variation and the structure of variability in the linguistic system.
Dosse (1993) relies on Durcrot's words, who claims that Benveniste is the linguist to whom he owes the most, due to the fact that he demonstrated that the linguistic system, whilst being a system, should take into account the phenomena of enunciation.
Imaginability furthers aboutness altered by the rebuilding of speech modalities, reconciling the gulf between the linguistic system and its nonverbal outside.
Because the language of phrenology presumably does not correspond to any real client phenomena, this linguistic system has been replaced by lexicons that supposedly have a higher degree of correspondence to the actual reality of clients.
Starting from the Saussurean distinctions between langue and parole, signifier and signified, syntagmatic and paradigmatic, Barthes extends semiotics beyond the linguistic system, making it applicable also to other non-linguistic phenomena, like garment, food or cars systems.
Anderson points out that, according to Kripke, a name is not part of the linguistic system, since it contains "only a concept of a referent that gives access to encyclopaedic information, indiosyncratic information particular to that or those individuals that bear(s) the name" (Anderson 2007: 158).
She focuses particularly on how contact between English and the other languages spoken in Malaysia have induced systematic variations and change in the linguistic system of Malaysian English.
It posits a set of hypotheses about the structure and operation of the linguistic system of the brain, and shows how linguistic information can be actually represented in the connectivity of a huge network where thousands of locations are active in parallel.