Mapp v. Ohio

(redirected from Mapp vs ohio)
Also found in: Legal.

Mapp v. Ohio,

case decided in 1961 by the U.S. Supreme Court. Dollree Mapp was convicted in a state court of possessing pornographic material in violation of Ohio law. Her conviction was obtained on the basis of evidence taken by the police when they entered (1957) her boardinghouse without a search warrant while looking for gambling materials. The Supreme Court, in overturning her conviction, declared that the exclusionary rule (based on the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution), which prohibits the use in federal court of evidence obtained through an illegal search and seizure, extended also to state courts. The ruling provoked a good deal of controversy; while proponents of the exclusionary rule claim that it is the only means of assuring freedom from illegal searches, opponents argue that a criminal should not go free because of a police officer's violation of the Constitution.
References in periodicals archive ?
The discussion in this paper revolves around the general nature of exclusionary rules' discerned by the judicial decisions viz: Mapp vs Ohio (1961) where by the discretionary behavior of the police is scrutinized in detail.
Hence having the judicial control on the unrestrained powers of police through Mapp vs Ohio decision, and Blazac vs Porto Rico decision to strengthen the jury system in the United States of America are the classis examples of ensuring individual liberty.
Instead, the central question may now be this: how would police react if the Supreme Court overruled Mapp vs Ohio