(redirected from Marginal analysis)
Also found in: Dictionary, Financial.



one of the methodological principles of bourgeois political economy, based on the use of the analysis of marginal values in research on economic laws and categories.

Marginal analysis in economic theory was introduced in the middle of the 19th century by A. Cournot of France and J. von Thuenen and H. Gossen of Germany. Marginalism became widespread in the last quarter of the 19th century, when bourgeois political economists initiated an intensive search for new forms and methods of theoretical analysis and of capitalist apologetics. Marginalism was used after about 1880 by the basic schools in bourgeois political economy, such as the Austrian school and the mathematical school. A thorough substantiation of marginalism was developed by J. B. Clark.

Marginalism views economics as the interaction of individual economies. In marginalism the study of the laws of economic functioning is based on the analysis of the economic behavior of the decision-maker during the production process and in the market. In this analysis quantitative methods can be used. Mathematical analysis is particularly useful in studying the functional connection between factors (for example, the dependence of demand for merchandise on the price, the prices of other goods, and the income of the consumer; the effect of various ratios of input of labor and capital on productivity). It is equally useful in deriving marginal functions (marginal utility, demand elasticity, the marginal productivity of the factors of production). The specific mathematical approach for marginal analysis was developed by the economists of the mathematical school.

The shift from free competition to all-powerful monopolies, and also the growing rate of state-monopoly regulation of the economy, placed before the bourgeois economists a number of practical tasks that could not be implemented by a strict reliance on the subjectivistic understanding of economic processes. Among the tasks were determining the use of economic-mathematical models, analyzing and forecasting market trends, computing the coefficients of the elasticity of demand, and optimalizing production inputs.

The characteristic feature of contemporary marginalists is the departure (although inconsistent) from the orthodox subjectivist interpretation of the economic categories and the enhancement, especially in the works of econometrists, of the role of formal-logical and empiric analysis. Thus, several bourgeois economists and econometrists (H. Schultz, C. Cobb, and P. Douglas) were able to develop mathematical methods of research into some problems of the economy, particularly forecasting and analyzing demand and optimalizing production inputs. A number of provisions and findings of the marginal-school economists had a definite influence on the development of a number of fields of applied mathematics, including theory of games, linear programming, and operations research. The basic marginalistic conceptions, such as marginal utility, marginal rate of replacement, marginal productivity, and marginal capital efficiency, are used in the contemporary bourgeois theories of demand, the firm, prices, and market equilibrium.

Overt attempts to refute the basic principles of Marxist political economy—the labor theory of value and the theory of surplus value—and the overestimation of the possibilities of quantitative analysis of economic theory characterize the methodology of marginalism. These traits of marginalism objectively brought its supporters to a simplified formal understanding of the complex system of social relations, to the creation of abstract models not reflecting reality, and to the formulation and support, with the help of mathematical techniques, interesting as such, of false and antiscientific reasoning. In modern bourgeois political economy, the basic ideas of marginalism (such as free enterprise) are defended by a number of economists (L. von Mises, F. Machlup); some of the marginalist principles and mathematical techniques have been developed and applied to the analysis of the problem of market equilibrium (G. J. Stigler, P. Samuelson, R. Quandt) and have been used by bourgeois econometrists (including A. Wald and J. Duesenberry).


Lenin V. I. “Agrarny vopros i ’kritiki Marksa,’” Poln. sobr. soch. , 5th ed., vol. 5.
Bliumin, I. G. Kritika burzhuaznoi politeconomii, vol. 1. Moscow, 1962.
Seligman, B. Osnovnye techeniia sovremennoi economicheskoi mysli,ch. 3. Moscow, 1968. (Translated from English.)
Mileikovskii, A., S. Nikitin, and R. Entov. “Evolutsiia marzhinalizma: burzhuaznye teorii stoimosti i tseny.” “Voprosy economiki,” 1968, no. 12.
Al’ter, L. B. Burzhuaznaia politicheskaia ekonomiia SShA. Moscow, 1971. Chapter 8.


References in periodicals archive ?
Publisher revenues utilized as a basis for multi-year marginal analysis are generated from the sale of video advertising (in-stream, in-banner, VOD, authenticated sign-in, viral and social), plus IP video subscription services or download-to-own stores.
Instead, the marginal analysis defines the tradeoff space, but not the solution, for the decision makers.
Marginal Analysis as a Mechanism to Assess Regulatory Scaling
We may excuse Bastiat; after all, marginal analysis was not part of the general body of economic knowledge in his time.
Overhead allocation# * Activity-based costing# * Standard costs and variance analysis# * Responsibility accounting# * Balanced scorecard# * Cost-volume-profit analysis# * Marginal analysis (e.
The methodology permits aggregate average emission estimates as well as marginal analysis of incremental changes in consumption by fuel type.
Economic theory and how it influenced their decisions involving their operations strategy will also be explored, focusing on the areas of business environment, economic profit, marginal analysis, consumer behavior and oligopoly strategies.
The company may consider more marginal analysis of costs in pricing products.
To the extent that individuals choose their retirement voluntarily, marginal analysis suggests that there will be only modest changes in well-being.
Chapters cover general principles; minimum cut-off grades; cut-off grade for polymetallic deposits; cot-off grade and optimization of processing plant operating conditions; cut-off grade and mine planning for open- pit and underground selective mining; cut-off grade and mine planning for block and panel caving; costs to be included in cut-off grade calculations; the limits of marginal analysis in a gold leaching operation; mining capacity and cut-off grade when processing capacity is fixed; processing capacity and cut-off grade when mining capacity is fixed; mining and processing capacity and cut-off grade when sales volume is fixed; releasing capacity constraints; and relationships between mine selectivity, deposit modeling, ore control, and cut-off grade.
Applying marginal analysis to environmental quality issues is not