It thus differs from the OBJ2 function (indirect object or secondary object), which licenses this cliticization type.
The definitions in (54) consist of phrase categories annotated with functional schemata that specify the type of grammatical function of each category, namely OBJ2, OBJ, OBL, and XCOMP, respectively.
The ditransitive and the dative constructions can be schematized as SUBJ V OBJ1 OBJ2 and SUBJ V OBJ2 'to' OBJ1, respectively.
Therefore, we may postulate that in those cases in which the OBJ2 slot of the ditransitive construction is filled in by a topic that lends itself to discussion rather than to (literal or metaphorical) transmission, the transitive construction amalgamates with what we have termed the X About Y construction.
se tenia que dar+prioridad CL VMOD V OBJ1 [a aquellas peticiones [que fueran urgentes]] OBJ2
EVALi = f (OBJ1, OBJ2, OBJ3, OBJ4, Industry, #IAs, #CAs/#IAs, Central, %NEW) (1)
Perhaps auditors only consider OBJ2 for systems that are already in daily use, or compliance-oriented auditors may not deal with new systems to any great extent.
There is some evidence of an association between EVAL8 and OBJ2 (compliance), perhaps due to efforts to ensure that application risks do not translate into violations of internal or external policies, laws, etc.
Suppose that OBJ1 has attributes A and B with A being the primary key and OBJ2 is a subclass of OBJ1 and has attributes A, B, and C.
After deleting object <a2,b2> from OBJ1, object <a2,b2,c2> vanishes from OBJ2 as Figure 7b shows, but <a2,c2> remains in REL_OBJ2.