Philosophical Anthropology


Also found in: Wikipedia.

Philosophical Anthropology

 

(1) In the broad sense of the term, the study of the nature, or essence, of man.

(2) In the narrow sense, a trend in Western European and primarily German philosophy in the first half of the 20th century. This school of thought was based on W. Dilthey’s idealist Lebensphilosophie (philosophy of life) and the phenomenology of such thinkers as E. Husserl; it sought to re-create the integral concept of man by utilizing and interpreting data of various sciences, including biology, psychology, ethnology, and sociology.

The birth of the philosophical school of anthropology is associated with the publication of M. Scheler’s The Place of Man in the Universe (1928) and H. Plessner’s Stages of the Organic and Man (1928); the central concern of these works is the difference between the human and the animal mode of existence. For Scheler, the difference lies in man’s capacity to free himself of the pressure of biological needs and to distance himself from the environment. The ruling principle of man’s existence, according to Scheler, is the infinite “spirit” that restrains and sublimates the natural drives of the living organism. In Plessner’s view, man’s specific attribute is “excentricity,” or his constant transcendence of the immediacy of existence; moreover, this “excentric” quality is not an attribute of some higher “stratum” of man’s being, but is rather the organizing principle of man’s being as a whole, beginning at the lowest vegetative levels.

Scheler’s ideas are further elaborated by A. Gehlen, who considers man as already differentiated from the animals in the elementary pairings of perception and movement. For Gehlen, the source of human activity is man’s biological “inadequacy”—that is, his imperfect organs as compared to the animals’ highly specialized ones, his reduced instinctual capacity, and the general lack of specificity in his makeup, which conditions human adaptability. As distinct from the animals, man is open to perceptions that have no inherent signaling function. Because of this greater freedom, man’s perception overflows with nonspecific stimuli that must be “unloaded,” and such unloading is achieved when the stimuli are symbolically processed to acquire their final form in language. The liberation of man from the pressure of his instincts is based on the gap between stimulus and action; man, according to Gehlen, is a “culturable” creature.

The concept of cultural anthropology proposed by E. Rothacker comes close to Gehlen’s ideas. This school of philosophical anthropology regards man as being determined by culture, or, in M. Landmann’s formulation, as “creating and being created by culture.” Scheler and his followers—for example, H. Hengstenberg and F.-J. von Rintelen—retain the concepts of traditional idealist metaphysics (such as spirit and eternity) in their interpretation of man; other philosophical anthropologists, largely influenced by Husserl’s phenomenology, are inclined to describe man’s specific attributes in presuppositionless and essentially positivist terms.

Philosophical anthropology after World War II has been generally characterized by a complex interaction with existentialism, pragmatism, depth psychology, and structuralism. J.-P. Sartre is representative of those who have sought an eclectic union between the anthropological approach and the principles of Marxism; attempts have also been made to apply the anthropological point of view to a revisionist interpretation of Marxism.

REFERENCES

Korneev, P. V. Sovremennaia filosofskaia antropologiia. [Moscow] 1967.
Burzhuaznaia filosofiia XX veka. Moscow, 1974.
References in periodicals archive ?
The Many Powers of the Human Soul: Von Hildebrand's Contributions to Scholastic Philosophical Anthropology, MARK K.
Finite but Unbounded: New Approaches in Philosophical Anthropology
Through the arguments he presented, Frunza succeeded in enhancing a dialogue between philosophical anthropology and scientific anthropology, as part of the larger dialogue between religion and culture.
Sloan develops a philosophical anthropology that returns to the phenomenological tradition, and draws upon the tradition of continental philosophical anthropology.
Working from his own translations of the original French texts, the author engages Fanon from dialectics, ethics, existentialism, and humanism to philosophical anthropology, phenomenology, and political theory as well as psychiatry and psychoanalysis.
Philosophical anthropology is a major source and inspiration of Gomez-Davila's philosophical reflection.
For Praeg, engaging with Ubuntu under the rubric of critical humanism leads thirdly to a consideration of philosophical anthropology which entails a re-opening of our minds to the meaning of humanity.
They look at mutual fecundation and transformation of philosophy and anthropology, sources of philosophical anthropology, and philosophical anthropology at work.
Topics left for additional consideration include music, phenomenology, philosophical anthropology, and Heidegger.
Another added advantage of this book is to be a good introduction to the Philosophical Anthropology initiated by the Spanish Philosopher Leonardo Polo and the understanding of the four personal trascendentals, which give a deeper vision of the social nature of man, its radical freedom, a new view of the acting intelligence of Aristotle and a profound view of personal love.
The role of black philosophy, then, having its point of origin within a matrix of oppression, even as this oppression was/is diasporic, is antagonistic and iconoclastic; indeed, resistant to claims of philosophical universality that are actually forms of discourse that are predicated upon a philosophical anthropology that is, in this case, underwritten by whiteness as the transcendental norm and that valorizes its vision of the world and the meaning of humanity at the exclusion of others.
This premise of disunity was already receiving concrete manifestation in the presupposition of the Christian European as reality purged of supposed embodied vices of emotion and passion in a philosophical anthropology of the truly human as this disembodied Christian European archetype.