Salomon Maimon


Also found in: Wikipedia.

Maimon, Salomon

 

(pseudonym of Salomon Heiman). Born 1753 (1754), in Mirts (Mir), near Nesvizh, present-day Byelorussian SSR; died Nov. 22, 1800, in Nieder-Siegersdorf, Silesia. Self-taught philospher, subjective idealist.

Maimon was educated in the Judaic tradition; he became an admirer of the philosophy of Maimonides and as a result changed his surname. In 1777 he settled in Prussia, where he made contact with M. Mendelssohn. Maimon criticized the philosophy of Kant; in particular, he rejected Kant’s “thing-in-itself,” attacking this concept from a position close to the idealistic viewpoints of F. H. Jacobi. Maimon formulated a “principle of determinacy” as the fundamental law of logic.

WORKS

Versuch über die Transcendentalphilosophie. Berlin, 1790.
Versuch einer neuen Logik oder Theorie des Denkens. Berlin, 1794. New edition: Berlin, 1911.
Lebensgeschichte, vols. 1-2. Berlin, 1911. (Russian translation in Evreis kaia biblioteka, vols. 1-2. St. Petersburg, 1871-72.)

REFERENCES

Fisher, K. Istoriia novoi filosofii, vol. 6, St. Petersburg, 1909. Chapters 6-7.
lakovenko, B. “Filosofskie kontseptsii S. Maimona.” Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii, book 4 (p. 114); book 5 (p. 115), 1912.
Atlas, S. From Critical to Speculative Idealism: The Philosophy of S . Maimon. The Hague, 1964.
Bergman, S. H. The Philosophy of S. Maimon. Jerusalem, 1967.
Kozlowski, R. Salomon Maimon jako krytyk i kontynuator filozofii. Poznań, 1969.
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
He reread and recommended to family and friends life-writing by Dostoyevsky, the proto-feminist and socialist Lily Braun, Salomon Maimon, and many others.
Throughout the book Freudenthal demonstrates Mendelssohn's embodiment of what Jonathan Israel calls the "conservative" or "moderate" Enlightenment by contrasting him with Salomon Maimon, his younger contemporary.
Jacobi, and Salomon Maimon correspond with images of the destruction of books or other forms of erasure, along with works by Jonathan Swift, Johann Karl Wezel, Louis-Sebastien Mercier, Elias Canetti, Henry James, Petrarca, Heinrich Heine, and Christine Brooke-Rose.
Topics include Salomon Maimon and skepticism, by Lidia Gasperoni; morality, irony, and skepticism in Fichte, by Llaus Vieweg; and transcendental philosophy, dialectic and the problem of determination in Fichte, by Angelica Nuzzo (affiliations are not given).
Salomon Maimon (2) se ocupa tempranamente (3) de manera detenida con este asunto y concluye que la vinculacion entre ambas fuentes de conocimiento no tendria lugar y que no habria argumento para que tuviera lugar (cf.
Deleuze here appeals to the second figure I would like to consider, the now-forgotten Salomon Maimon.
To underscore his point that the terms of discussion on the status and identity of Blacks and Jews for the past two centuries were set during the Enlightenment, Philipson uses two illustrative autobiographies from the eighteenth century-those by Olaudah Equiano (4) and Salomon Maimon (5)-- and two from the twentieth--by Richard Wright (6) and Alfred Kazin (7)--to outline the major questions he wishes to pursue in the book.
Finally she examines autobiographies by people who originated from the ghetto, beginning with the unforgettable memoirs of Salomon Maimon and drawing attention particularly to the interesting reminiscences of Sigmund Mayer, a liberal Viennese businessman born in the ghetto of Pressburg (Bratislava).
17) Salomon Maimon, Kritische Untersuchungen uber den menschlichen Geist, in Gesammelte Werke 7:67; hereafter GW.
Also in this first group are Salomon Maimon (1753-1800), the first Jewish thinker who attributed an unbiasedly positive role to Spinoza in the development of modern philosophy; Berthold Auerbach (1812-1882), the poet who was the first to translate most of Spinoza's works into German and who wrote a novel in which Spinoza's friend Lodewijk Meyer stated that it was a Jew (i.
The paper examines the way in which Salomon Maimon (1753-1800) combines Humean skepticism and Leibnizian rationalism to mount an innovative challenge to Kant.