Galvanic Skin Response

(redirected from Skin conductance response)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Financial, Acronyms.
Related to Skin conductance response: galvanic skin response

galvanic skin response

[gal′van·ik ′skin ri‚späns]
(physiology)
The electrical reactions of the skin to any stimulus as detected by a sensitive galvanometer; most often used experimentally to measure the resistance of the skin to the passage of a weak electric current. Also known as electrodermal response.

Galvanic Skin Response

 

psychogalvanic reflex, a change in potential difference or electric resistance between two points on the skin in response to various stimuli or emotional excitement; first described by the Russian physiologist I. R. Tarkhanov in 1889.

Galvanic skin response is usually recorded by measuring the indexes between the palmar and dorsal surfaces of the hand or between the palmar surfaces of both hands. The galvanic skin response is a negative shift of biopotential or a decrease in electrocutaneous resistance caused by the activity of the sweat glands just before perspiration. This activity is induced by nervous impulses proceeding from the central nervous system through the sympathetic fibers. The central structures responsible for the galvanic skin response are found in the reticular formation of the mesencephalon and hypothalamus and are activated by the higher sections of the brain (chiefly the limbic system—the most important part of the brain’s emotional apparatus). The galvanic skin response is a component of the orientation reaction, that is, the response to unexpected change characterizing the processes leading to any kind of new action.

L. P. LATASH

References in periodicals archive ?
The percentages of cases and controls presenting a skin conductance response or any specific symptom to the test substance are shown in Figure 6.
For all stimulus presentations in Phases 3 and 4, skin conductance response (SCR) was measured during a predefined assessment interval which began with the onset of the stimulus and ended 10 s after the stimulus offset.
Let us denote the number of prestimulus skin conductance responses in all sessions of a given pair by k, their averaged onset time before the shock by T (measured in sample points), the number of casual responses by K, the number of total sample points in the nonprestimulus and nonpoststimulus regions where a bump could start by N, and the number of points in the prestimulus region where a bump could start by n.
Finally, a 2 x 2 ANOVA (remote staring x presence of starer) analysis of the averaged skin conductance responses for the 60 administrations of the different conditions suggested that there were no significant effects for remote staring detection, F(1,19) = 1.
Compared with the relaxation group, IBMT subjects also had lower heart rates and skin conductance responses, increased belly breathing amplitude and decreased chest respiration rates.