Encyclopedia

Hamito-Semitic Languages

Also found in: Wikipedia.
(redirected from Afroasiatic languages)
The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.

Hamito-Semitic Languages

 

the traditional name for the family of Afrasian, or Afro-Asiatic, languages found in North Africa and southwestern Asia.

The Hamito-Semitic languages evidently have five branches: Semitic, Egyptian, Berbero-Libyan, Cushitic, and Chad. Some researchers refer to the Western Cushitic languages as the Om-otic branch. The Semitic languages have the greatest number of speakers, about 120 million. The Egyptian branch died out in the 17th century, although a late form of Egyptian—Coptic—is still used in the liturgy of Egyptian Christians. The Berber branch consists of dialect groups that closely resemble each other. The ancient Libyan-Numidian language and, less probably, the extinct language of the Canary Islands— Guanche—appear to have belonged to the Berber branch as well. The Cushitic languages are divided into five subbranches. The Chad group includes Hausa, Kotoko, and many other languages. Preliminary classification indicates that the Chad group consists of ten subgroups.

The Hamito-Semitic languages are characterized by three groups of consonants: voiced, voiceless, and “emphatic,” the last type being glottalized, preglottalized, or velarized consonants. They use y, w, and glottal stops as consonants. Some ancient Afrasian phonemes, such as laterals, pharyngeals, and affricates, were lost by the Berbero-Libyan branch, Late Egyptian, and certain Semitic, Cushitic, and Chad languages; emphatic consonants were also lost in some languages. The northern groups—Semitic, Berbero-Libyan, Egyptian, and, to some extent, Cushitic—are characterized by roots consisting of three consonants, patterns of word-formation involving vowel gradations of the root, and the use of a small number of affixes. Prefixal conjugation of verbs of action is characteristic of the Semitic and Berbero-Libyan branches and the northern, eastern, and central subgroups of the Cushitic branch; originally, the imperfective, or durative, aspect was formed from roots with a full vowel scheme, and the perfective, or punctual, aspect was formed from roots with a reduced vowel scheme.

A noteworthy archaic feature is the suffixally conjugated predicate, which expresses a quality or state; this feature is found in the Semitic languages (Akkadian), the Berber languages (Kabyle), the Chad languages (Musgu), Egyptian, and other languages. In all the Cushitic languages, a new conjugation of the verb developed that historically derives from a combination of the prefixally conjugated form of an auxiliary verb and the nominal form of the main verb. The same phenomenon may be seen in the Chad group; in the Cushitic languages, however, the verb element corresponding originally to the auxiliary verb is placed at the end of the complex verb form, whereas in Hausa and other Chad languages it is placed at the beginning. Egyptian developed a special verb system based on attributive and prepositional constructions with the verbal noun; the logical subject coincided grammatically with the attribute and the predicate coincided with the determinatum. Only verb forms expressing a quality or state followed the archaic Common Afrasian pattern in Egyptian. All of the Hamito-Semitic languages are characterized by derived forms of the verb, such as causative, iterative, and reflexive.

Because Common Afrasian became divided into branches in remote antiquity, the modern Hamito-Semitic languages are less closely related to each other than are the languages of the Indo-European family. There are appreciable similarities between pronouns, verbal prefixes, and a relatively small number of very ancient words. Most of the Hamito-Semitic languages have not preserved the ancient suffixal pattern of inflection, including the original nominal declension.

REFERENCES

D’iakonov, I. M. Semitokhamilskie iazyki. Moscow, 1965.
D’iakonov, I. M. Iazyki Perednei Azii. Moscow, 1967.
Dolgopol’skii, A. B. Sravnitel’no-istoricheskaia fonetika kushitskikh iazykov. Moscow, 1973.
Cohen, M. Essai comparatif sur le vocabulaire et la phonétique du chamito-sémitique. Paris, 1947.
Greenberg, J. The Languages of Africa, 2nd ed. The Hague, 1966.
Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. 6. Edited by T. A. Sebeok. The Hague-Paris, 1970.
Hamito-Semitica. Edited by T. By non and J. Bynon. Paris, 1973.

I. M. D’IAKONOV

The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Mentioned in
References in periodicals archive
In Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Erin Shay (eds.), The Afroasiatic languages, 423-504.
In Zygmunt Frajzyngier and Erin Shay (eds.), The Afroasiatic languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 236-341.
Richard Hayward (2000) informs us that linguists should be particularly aware of the intellectual debt owed by the Western world to speakers of Afroasiatic languages because of the enormous breakthrough they attained in the expression of language in written form and made possible alphabetic writing.
The origins of speech in Afroasiatic languages and Sino-Caucasian
The pattern *[C.sub.1][C.sub.2][C.sub.3][C.sub.2][C.sub.3] occurs throughout West Semitic, but is absent from East Semitic.ss Even though it is not found in East Semitic, the pattern *[C.sub.1][C.sub.2][C.sub.3][C.sub.2][C.sub.3] can be reliably reconstructed to Proto-Semitic since similar forms are attested in other Afroasiatic languages, such as Egyptian swtwt 'Spazierweg' (EG 4.1 78) and whahs 'Uberhebung' (EG 1.2 340).
In Research in Afroasiatic Grammar II: Selected Papers from the Fifth Conference on Afroasiatic Languages, Paris, 2000, Jacqueline Lecarme (ed.), 151-185.
Two of them consider links between different Afroasiatic languages, but the others are devoted to Semitic languages.
In Jacqueline Lecarme (ed.), Research in Afroasiatic Grammar II: Selected papers from the Fifth Conference on Afroasiatic Languages, Paris, 2000, 241-61.
Probability is a crucial factor in assessing the genetic connection between Egyptian and other Afroasiatic languages. Questions of probability arise as soon as one comes face to face with the contrast between, on the one hand, the widely held view that the evidence for this connection is very sparse and, on the other hand, the sheer bulk of a volume of one thousand pages devoted to words beginning with just one of the about twenty-five phonemes of Egyptian.
(ed.).Research in Afroasiatic Grammar II: selected papers from the fifth conference on Afroasiatic languages, Paris 2000, 241-261.
April 2006, and at the Joint session of the 217th meeting of the American Oriental Society and the 35th meeting of the North American Conference of Afroasiatic Languages, San Antonio, March 2007.
Papers from the Third Conference on Afroasiatic Languages, Sophia Antipolis 1996) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 202], ed.
Copyright © 2003-2025 Farlex, Inc Disclaimer
All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only. This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional.