Fallaw argues that two informal political institutions were critical to defining the interactions among diverse national, state and local actors in the Cardenas years--"caciques" (local bosses or strongmen who controlled communities, political organizations, or unions) and "
camarillas" (networks of elites linked by family, friendship or interest).
Among these are their tacking back and forth smoothly between political events at the national, state, and local levels; their untangling of the
camarilla politics associated with Porfirian planters and revolutionary reformers such as Olegario Molina, Avelino Montes, Jose Maria Pino Suarez, and other major figures of the period; and their skillful reconstruction of forms of popular mobilization and demobilization in the countryside by the state's various contending elite political factions between 1909 and 1915.
Was the man an idealist supremely convinced of his own rectitude, or a clever mountebank, an actor lusting for power who ruthlessly exploited both his
camarilla and his nation for personal gratification?