Encyclopedia

Theodosius Dobzhansky

Also found in: Dictionary, Medical, Wikipedia.
(redirected from Dobzhansky)
The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.

Dobzhansky, Theodosius

 

(Feodosii Grigor’evich Dobrzhanskii). Born Jan. 12 (25), 1900, in Nemirov, in what is now the Ukrainian SSR; died Dec. 19, 1975, in Davis, Calif. American geneticist. Member of the National Academy of Sciences (1941) and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Dobzhansky graduated from the University of Kiev in 1921. He taught at Leningrad University from 1924 until 1927, when he emigrated to the United States. From 1929 to 1940 he taught at the California Institute of Technology, becoming a professor of genetics in 1936. From 1940 to 1962 he was a professor of zoology at Columbia University in New York, and from 1962 to 1970 he was a professor at Rockefeller University in New York. He became a professor of genetics at the University of California at Davis in 1971.

Dobzhansky was one of the founders of experimental population genetics and the author of the synthetic theory of evolution. He made a major contribution to the study of isolating mechanisms of evolution. Dobzhansky was a fellow of the Royal Society of London and other foreign academies of sciences.

WORKS

Genetics and the Origin of Species, 3rd ed. New York, 1951.
Heredity and the Nature of Man. London, 1965.
Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. New York–London, 1970.
Evolution. San Francisco, 1977. (With other authors.)

REFERENCES

Ayala, F. J. ‘Theodosius Dobzhansky: The Man and the Scientist.” Annual Review of Genetics, 1976, vol. 10, pp. 1–6.
Beardmore, J. A. “Theodosius Dobzhansky, 1900–1975.” Heredity, 1976, vol. 37, no. 1.
Ehrman, L., and B. Wallace. “Theodosius Grigorievich Dobzhansky.” Nature, 1976, vol. 260, no. 5,547, p. 179.
The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Mentioned in
References in periodicals archive
Para Theodosius Dobzhansky la respuesta a esta cuestion era muy sencilla: "la mayor parte de los biologos ...
Teoricamente, este fenomeno se asocia con perdida de homeostasis de desarrollo, es decir, la capacidad para compensar eficientemente los efectos adversos del ambiente para desarrollar en forma precisa el plan ontogenetico contenido en el genoma de los individuos, en un ambiente determinado (Waddington, 1953, 1957; Dobzhansky & Wallace, 1953; Dobzhansky, 1955; Thoday, 1958; Nijhout & Davidowitz, 2003).
Lo hara en compania de autores tan variopintos como Austin, Bakhtin, Baldwin, Baltes, Bandura, Bartlett, Bateson, Benedict, Berger y Luckman, Boas, Bourdieu, Bruner, Campbell, Cela Conde, Childe, Chomsky, Cole, Cosmides y Tooby, Dawkins, de Waal, Deleuze y Guattari, Dennett, Dobzhansky, Durkheim, Edelman, Fodor, Foucault, Geertz, Giddens, Goodall, Gould, Haeckel, Haraway, Harlow, Ingold, Jablonka, Jahoda, Karmiloff-Smith, Levi-Strauss, Lorenz, Margulis, Maturana, Mayr, Mead, Morin, Oyama, Piaget, Tomasello o Vigotsky, por citar solo algunos.
The first edition, reviewed in the March 2008 issue of this journal by Owen Gingerich, focused on eight figures: Arie Leegwater on Charles Coulson, Jitse van der Meer on Theodosius Dobzhansky, James Moore on Ronald Fisher, Peter Bowler on Julian Huxley, Richard Beyler on Pascual Jordan, Torsten Ruting on Ivan Pavlov, Edward Davis on Michael Pupin, and Mark Stoll on Edward Wilson.
In 1947, in an early manifestation of this new alliance, Theodosius Dobzhansky and his anthropologist ally, M.F.
Genetic divergence, due to a combination of natural selection and random genetic drift when two populations are geographically isolated, may eventually result in intrinsic reproductive isolation, or extrinsic isolation in the case of ecological speciation (Schluter, 2001; Schluter and Conte, 2009), unless the two populations become reconnected and genetic exchange reoccurs (Dobzhansky, 1937; Orr and Presgraves, 2000).
Fodor and Piattelli-Palmarini assert that such recent developments as evo-devo somehow undermine the statement of legendary neo-Darwinist Theodosius Dobzhansky that "nothing in biology makes sense except in light of evolution," So far as I know, all the researchers the authors cite would side with Dobzhansky by asserting that nothing in their work makes sense except in light of evolution.
Among his perspectives are mathematical and philosophical biologist Haldane weighs, in, Huxley proclaims a new synthesis, chromosome inversions in Drosophila, the changing views of Dobzhansky and Wright, and whether evolutionary theory is scientific.
Copyright © 2003-2025 Farlex, Inc Disclaimer
All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only. This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional.