If we apply the half-explicit
Euler method which was proposed in [17] to the test DAE (3.16), then we obtain the DAE stability function
To estimate the depth of the deep structures, the
Euler method is applied the RTE-TMI map.
[11,12] studied the Vaserstein bound for
Euler method and they proved an O([h.sup.(2/3-epsilon])]) for a one-dimensional diffusion process where h is the step-size and then they generalize the result to SDEs of any dimension with 0(h[square root of log(1/h))] bound when the coefficients are time-homogeneous.
As we all know, there are many solutions corresponding to the second-order ODEs, including the
Euler method, the improved
Euler method and the Runge-Kutta method et al.
The results provided by the presented method will be compared with those by the modified
Euler method, Newmark method, widely-used fourth-order RK method, and the exact results, respectively.
The direct application of the method to such pathological cases has been compared with the classical
Euler method, showing that singularity and ambiguity drawbacks do not affect the proposed solution.
The numerical properties of impulsive differential equations attracted attentions of scholars since Ran et al.'s work in [7], which showed that the explicit
Euler method is stable for impulsive differential equations, while the implicit
Euler method is not.
Here [theta] = 0 defines the explicit
Euler method, [theta] = 1 defines the backward
Euler method and [theta] =1/2 gives the symmetric (or trapezoidal)
Euler method [13].