On Saturdays,
Italics hosts a celebration of seafood with ingredients from local Thai Or Tor Kor and Sam Yan markets, as well as international selections from the famous international sources of Rungis in Paris and Tsukiji in Japan.
While Garamont established the form that old-face romans were to follow for 200 years, Granjon played in the margins, redefining
italic and cutting almost ninety faces, including Civilite, Greek, Hebrew, and other exotics, as well as music type and the arabesque ornaments or fleurons which are still famous.
Despite the curatorial quirks, which also include the absence of significant figures (Vinccnzo Agnetti, Pier Paolo Calzolari, and Mimmo Paladino, for example), "
Italics" holds its own among the many other shows that have been devoted to the Italian art of this period, with important works often beautifully installed.
EXERCISE 29.2
Italics and Underlining Rewrite the sentences below, underlining words and phrases where necessary.
Bush turned to Tenet and asked: 'Wha authorized putting him on pain medication?'" (Risen's
italics.)
Notice you can use the underscore line (_) in the same way to set
italics automatically.
However, the text used as a highlight to stress important points is red and thus hard to read, especially when it is in
italics. This then creates the opposite effect of what the highlighting is meant to do--I know it is important, but I cannot read it easily.
6) Finally, Postrel describes my book as offering a "scientific-seeming alternative to public policies that expand choice" (my
italics).
n TNS manager Ken McKenna has a full squad to choose from.last six games LIVERPOOL TNS (n) 3-3* Milan (n) 1-0* Carmarthen (h) 2-1 Aston Villa (a) 2-2 Pt Talbot (a) 1-3 Arsenal (a) 0-0 H'fordwest (h) 1-0* Chelsea (a) 1-0 Carmarthen (h) 1-1 Middlesbro (h) 2-0 Cwmbran (a) 0-0* Chelsea (a) 3-1* Rhyl last season in
italicsTyson prefers
italics, stubs, obliques, and flexible nibs.
Italics or quotation marks inserted by the author amid quotes from letter writers alert the reader to his skepticism regarding the correspondent's motives.