A further important dimension to the Griffiths Report and the White Paper was the philosophy that community care should be provided within the context of welfare pluralism; that is, that the WELFARE STATE and local authorities should not be the principle providers of care, rather, community care should be provided by a mixture of local authority, private and voluntary organizations. Although community care has been celebrated as a means of providing an alternative to institutional care (which is seen to lead to dependency), it has been criticized in a number of ways:
A number of empirical studies have demonstrated that most caring is undertaken by women, usually daughters and daughters-in-law. However, the number of male carers increased during the 1980s and some authors have speculated that the proportion of male carers might increase further as more women are encouraged to ‘return to the labour market’ to fill the shortage of labour predicted for the 21st century On the other hand, historical analyses of womens work demonstrate that women have often been expected to undertake paid work whilst also caring for others in the family A cynical observation about community care, therefore, is that it is a means of providing for the welfare of others at a minimum of government expense. However, community-care programmes in other countries, such as Sweden, have demonstrated that community care can be a very good means of enabling needy people to live with some independence in the community although the evidence from these schemes shows that effective community care can be more expensive than institutional care.