The effective pair potential for FSc is defined by [DELTA]([??], [??]) = [DELTA]([??])[THETA](x - L),where for spin-singlet
s-wave pairing [DELTA]([??]) is in the following form: [THETA]([??]) = i[DELTA][[sigma].sub.y] [12].
In this work, a numerical method for computing the dynamics of the two-component dipolar BEC is considered, where one equation has dipole-dipole interaction and the other has only the usual
s-wave contact interaction.
One type of
S-wave reflects from Earth's surface halfway between an earthquake and a seismometer.
Shown as P-wave or
S-wave velocity ([v.sub.p] and [v.sub.s] respectively), the measured values over a period of 8 days for specimens with 4% cement and 2% rubbershred additions are given in Figure 8.
Various expressions of the reciprocity parameter according to the type of wave and the propagation medium are summarized in Table 1, all coming from Hill [12] except for
S-wave. In that particular case, we simply propose to adopt the same definition as for L-waves but replacing the expression of longitudinal wave velocity by the shear wave velocity.
Although information can be extracted from compression wave (P-wave) data alone, the inclusion of shear waves (
S-waves) can be used as an additional source of observations to further constrain and narrow uncertainty in the results.
S-wave velocity changes and/or anisotropy, as a function of the propagation direction, are mainly due to changes in fracture pattern and orientation.
The left diagram represents a neutron capture by a target nucleus, which results in an
s-wave compound resonance state (positive parity).
These effects show up as a gap of several minutes between P-wave and
S-wave induced motion detected thousands of miles from the focus of an earthquake.
Dry P-wave and
S-wave velocities ([V.sub.P] and [V.sub.S]) were measured at the GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam.
Prompted by these results we acquired two reflection
s-wave profiles across the lineament at prominent west-facing scarps at Porter Gap and Union City, Tennessee.
In addition to the ever-present goal of improved resolution, the most urgent challenge in GST modeling is deriving comparable quality results for P- and
S-wave heterogeneities, which is necessary to distinguish between the thermal and compositional variations.