According to conclusion (1) and definition 3, the fixed value of each FTIDom is simply the value written by the
assignment statement at the start of the influence domain, that is, InVal(FTI[Dom.sub.i] ([alpha]))(i [member of] [N.sup.+]) .
(3) Measurements of average and maximum number of side effects found per
assignment statement, per assignment through pointer dereference (i.e., a through-dereference
assignment statement such as *p=), per procedure, and per call have been recorded for both algorithms.
For example, if $[abc] is in a text line, or in a directive line and not on the left-hand side of an
assignment statement, it is replaced by eval (M ["abc"]).
(a) The even numbers A 1 2 2 4 3 6 4 8 5 10 6 12 7 14 8 16 9 18 10 20 (b) The odd numbers A 1 1 2 3 3 5 4 7 5 9 6 11 7 13 8 15 9 17 10 19 (c) The first three columns of Elana's times table A B C 1 1 2 3 2 2 4 6 3 3 6 9 4 4 8 12 5 5 10 15 6 6 12 18 7 7 14 21 8 8 16 24 9 9 18 27 10 10 20 30 At this point, the teacher suggested, "What if we change the number in our
assignment statement?" Robert changed the
assignment statement in cell A2 to "=A1+10." Then he changed the value of Al to 10, and he produced the multiples of ten.
The Pascal
assignment statement that shows the use of a coercion is:
We now describe the transfer function (using the compact representation) for an
assignment statement to an access path of a pointer type.
* In each
assignment statement, the same variable does not occur on both the left-hand and right-hand side.
(1) a transport
assignment statement has the empty relation as its suspension semantics.
As names are only used in 'expressions', one needs supposedly fewer lexical entries for the same phonological form; but this is no representational gain, as the authors complaining about the 'many names of the same phonological shape' (146) seem to think, since one needs now as 'many'
assignment statements (for each possible referent of an 'expression' built by using that name).
Output assignment for each wire and output variable: In Rule 4, the target FBD represented by a set of connected function blocks is translated into
assignment statements from top to bottom in accordance with the execution order of the FBD.