In the
experimental condition, no significant "Time" effect was observed for maximal power exerted during SJ.
Each animal underwent both control and
experimental conditions; we randomly selected half to experience control conditions first, and the other half experienced
experimental conditions first.
We then performed a 2 (
experimental condition: explicit rejection, ambiguous rejection) x 2 (type of words: social rejection words, nonsocial negative words) x 2 (probe position: congruent, incongruent) analysis of variance.
Results of a 2 (type of stimulus: positive vs negative) x 3 (
experimental condition: unimodal vs congruent vs incongruent) mixed design MANOVA showed neither a main effect of hedonic valence, Pillai's trace = .048, F(2, 26) = 0.66,p = .053, nor a main effect of arousal
experimental condition Pillai's trace = .764, F(4, 52) = 1.83, p = .129.
Therefore, in any resulting solution there will be a certain amount of valid clusters (i.e., clusters that contain at least one item belonging to each
experimental condition), and a certain amount of invalid clusters (i.e., clusters that do not allow researchers to select at least one item for each
experimental condition).
An ANOVA for visuospatial ability x
experimental condition was performed to verify a similar distribution of visuospatial ability between experimental groups.
Here, we developed two different
experimental conditions. One was simple symmetric TSP.
Therefore, we propose here a systematic analysis through PARAFAC and HC strategies of a series of SFC columns in a representative set of
experimental conditions to unravel the role of three interacting parameters (temperature, pressure, and gradient of organic modifier) with a representative set of drugs (acidic, basic, and neutral).
Finally, children in the
experimental condition were asked three questions about team "performance": "Which team do you think had the most fun these weeks?"; "which team do you think got in the most trouble these weeks?"; "which team do you think deserved to win the competion [sic]?" Children's responses were rated 1 (favouring the ingroup) or 0 (favouring the outgroup) so that each child's score on his/her team's performance ranged from 0 to 3.
A 3 (
experimental condition) x 2 (participant sex) log-linear analysis was performed, with the frequency of participants who agreed to give a late note as the dependent variable.