(redirected from antiferromagnetic)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Acronyms, Wikipedia.
Related to antiferromagnetic: Ferrimagnetic, antiferromagnetic resonance, Neel temperature


A property possessed by some metals, alloys, and salts of transition elements in which the atomic magnetic moments, at sufficiently low temperatures, form an ordered array which alternates or spirals so as to give no net total moment in zero applied magnetic field. The most direct way of detecting such arrangements is by means of neutron diffraction. See Neutron diffraction

The transition temperature below which the spontaneous antiparallel magnetic ordering takes place is called the Néel temperature. A plot of the magnetic susceptibility of a typical antiferromagnetic powder sample versus temperature is shown in the illustration. Below the Néel point, which is characterized by the sharp kink in the susceptibility, the spontaneous ordering opposes the normal tendency of the magnetic moments to align parallel to the applied field. Above the Néel point, the substance is para-magnetic, and the susceptibility obeys the Curie-Weiss

law, as in Eq. (1), with a negative paramagnetic Curie temperature. The Néel temperature is similar to the Curie temperature in ferromagnetism.

The cooperative transition that characterizes antiferromagnetism is thought to result from an interaction energy U of the form given in Eq. (2), where S i and S j are

the spin angular momentum vectors associated with the magnetic moments of neighbor atoms i and j, and Jij is an interaction constant. If all Jij are positive, the lowest energy is achieved with all S i and S j parallel, that is, coupled ferromagnetically. Negative Jij between nearest-neighbor pairs (i,j) may lead to simple antiparallel arrays; if the distant neighbors also have sizable negative Jij, a spiral array may have lowest total energy. The interaction constant in Eq. (2) probably arises from superexchange coupling. This is an effective coupling between magnetic spins which is indirectly routed via nonmagnetic atoms in salts and probably via conduction electrons in metals. See Ferromagnetism, Helimagnetism

The magnetic moments are known to have preferred direction. Anisotropic effects come from magnetic dipole forces and also from spin-orbit coupling combined with superexchange. Some nearly antiparallel arrays such as Fe2O3 show a slight bending (called canting) and exhibit weak ferromagnetism. The anisotropy affects the susceptibility of powder samples and is of extreme importance in antiferromagnetic resonance. See Magnetic resonance

Magnetic susceptibility of powdered manganese oxideenlarge picture
Magnetic susceptibility of powdered manganese oxide



one of the magnetic states of a substance; in antiferromagnetism the elementary (atomic) magnets of adjacent particles are oriented opposite to one another (antiparallel), so that the magnetization of the body as a whole is very small. In ferromagnetism, orientation of the elementary magnets in the same direction results in high magnetization of the body.

Up to the early 1930’s all substances were divided according to their magnetic properties into three groups: diamagnet-ic, paramagnetic, and ferromagnetic. Antiferromagnetism was discovered while the properties of paramagnetic materials at low temperatures were being studied. Paramagnetic materials are magnetized in a magnetic field so that the direction of magnetization coincides with the direction of the field. The magnetization / is proportional to the strength H of the magnetic field: / = κH. The proportionality factor κ, the magnetic susceptibility, is very small—from 10-5 to 10-6 in cgs units—for paramagnetic materials. The majority of paramagnetic substances are characterized by a specific form of the relation for magnetic susceptibility as a function of temperature—the susceptibility increases with a decrease in temperature in an inverse proportion (the Curie law; see Figure 1, curve a). At the end of the 1920’s and the beginning of the 1930’s compounds were discovered (oxides and chlorides of manganese, iron, cobalt, and nickel) that have a completely different form of temperature dependence for the magnetic susceptibility κ(T). In the curves of κ as a function of T for these compounds a maximum was observed (see Figure 1, curves bc and bd). In addition, it was discovered that below the temperature of the maximum, κ is strongly dependent on the orientation of the crystal in the magnetic field. If the field is directed, for example, along the principal crystallographic axis, then the value of κ along this direction (designated by kT) decreases, approaching 0 as T → 0°K. In directions perpendicular to this axis the value of κ (designated by κ) remains constant (that is, it does not de

Table 2

pend on temperature). In the curves that show the temperature dependence of the specific heat capacity for these substances, sharp maximums were also observed at the corresponding temperatures. These experimental facts pointed to some kind of rearrangement of the internal structure in the substance at a specific temperature.

Figure 1. Temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility k: (a) for paramagnetic materials not undergoing a transition into an ordered state down to very low temperatures (k = C/T); (b) for paramagnetic materials that change into the antiferromagnetic state at T = TN; (C ) for polycrystalline antiferromagnetic materials; (d) for monocrystalline antiferromagnetic materials along the axis of easy magnetization (K11); (e) for monocrystalline antiferromagnetic materials in directions perpendicular to the axis of easy magnetization (K1).

In the 1930’s the Soviet physicist L. D. Landau and the French physicist L. Néel explained the anomaly of the transition from a paramagnetic material into the new state, as indicated above, and called it antiferromagnetic. The nature of this transition is as follows. Paramagnetism is observed in substances having in their composition atoms (ions) with unfilled inner electron shells. These atoms (ions) have an atomic magnetic moment, and they can be regarded as elementary magnets. At high temperatures, owing to the intense thermal motion, the direction of these magnets is continuously changing in random fashion. Therefore, the time average of the magnetic moment <μ> of every magnetic ion in the absence of an external field turns out to be zero. Below a certain temperature, called the Néel temperature TN (which corresponds to the maximum in the magnetic susceptibility curve), the forces of the interaction between magnetic moments of adjacent ions prove to be stronger than the random action of the thermal motion. As a result, the average magnetic moment of each ion becomes different from zero and assumes a definite value and direction; magnetic ordering appears in the substance. The ordering in antiferromagnetisms is characterized by the fact that the magnetic moments of all (or a large part) of the close neighbors of any ion are directed opposite to its own magnetic moment. (In ferromagnetism they all go in one direction.) In other words, in antiferromagnetism the like-named poles of adjacent elementary magnets are pointed in the opposite direction. In each antiferromagnetic material a specific order is established for the sequence of magnetic moments. (An example is shown in Figure 2.) The order of the sequence for the magnetic moments together with their direction relative to the crystallographic axes controls the antiferromagnetic structure of a substance. Such a structure can be thought of as a system of three-dimensional lattices (called sublattices) of magnetic ions fitted to each other with the magnetic moments located at the nodes of each and parallel to one another. In antiferromagnetism the magnetic ions are of the same kind in all the sublattices. Consequently, the total magnetic moments of the sublattices are precisely balanced, and in the absence of an external field the antiferromagnetic material as a whole has no resultant magnetic moment. Under the influence of an external magnetic field the antiferromagnetic material becomes weakly magnetized. Typical values for such magnetic susceptibility are from 10-4 to 10-6 cgs units.

Figure 2. Magnetic structure: (a) cubic antiferromagnetic material MnO (the period of the magnetic structure am is twice as large as the period of the crystal structure a0); (b) tetragonal antiferromagnetic material MnF2. The nodes having the same direction for the magnetic moments form a three-dimensional magnetic sublattice.

For a long time no experimental methods existed that could confirm directly the existence of an antiferromagnetic structure. In 1949 it was shown that the antiferromagnetic structure could be revealed and studied by the methods of neutron diffraction. Neutrons have no electric charge but possess a magnetic moment. A beam of slow neutrons passing through antiferromagnetic material interacts with the magnetic ions of the substance and is scattered. A relationship obtained experimentally between the number of scattered neutrons and the scattering angle makes it possible to determine the arrangement of the magnetic ions in antiferromagnetic material and the average value of their magnetic moments.

Two kinds of forces are responsible for the creation of antiferromagnetic ordering and for the particular orientation of the ions’ magnetic moments relative to the crystallographic axes: for the ordering it is the exchange interaction forces (electrical in nature), and for the orientation it is the forces of the magnetic anisotropy. In antiferromagnetism the exchange forces strive to make each pair of adjacent magnetic moments precisely antiparallel. But they cannot predetermine the direction of the moments relative to the crystallographic axes. This direction, which is known as the axis of easy magnetization, is determined by the magnetic anisotropic forces. These are the result of magnetic interaction between adjacent magnetic ions and the more complicated interactions of the electrons in the magnetic ions with electrical fields acting within the crystal.

To accord with these two types of forces, two effective magnetic fields are incorporated in the theoretical description of antiferromagnetism: an exchange field HE and an anisotropy field HA. The concept of having two effective magnetic fields acting in antiferromagnetic materials makes it possible to account for many properties, particularly their behavior in variable external magnetic fields. The transition from the paramagnetic state to the antiferromagnetic at the Néel temperature TN is the result of a phase transition of the second kind. A feature of this transition is the smooth (without a discontinuity) but very steep increase in the average value of the magnetic moment for each ion near TN (Figure 3). This increase explains the anomalies cited above—the

Figure 3. Temperature dependence of the average magnetic moment <µ> of an ion at each node of a sublattice; µ̄ is the intrinsic magnetic moment of an ion.

rise in specific heat capacity near TN and the similar temperature variation of the thermal expansion coefficient, elastic modulus, and a number of other quantities.

The study of antiferromagnetic materials has made a significant contribution to the development of modern concepts regarding the physics of magnetic phenomena. Among the related discoveries are new types of magnetic structures (weak ferromagnetism) and helical structures; new phenomena detected include piezomagnetism and magneto-electric effect; concepts on exchange and other types of interaction in magnetics have been extended. Antiferromagnetism has not yet found a practical use, because a large portion of the macroscopic physical properties show little change when a substance is transferred to the antiferromagnetic state. The high frequency properties are an exception. In many antiferromagnetic materials, strong resonance absorption of electromagnetic radiation is observed for wavelengths from 1 cm down to 0.001 cm.


Kirenskii, L. V. Magnetizm, 2nd ed. Moscow, 1967.
Borovik-Romanov, A. S. “Antiferromagnetizm.” In Itogi nauki: Fiz.-mat. nauki. Vol. 4: Antiferromagnetizm i ferrity. Moscow, 1962.
Redkozemel’nye ferromagnetiki i antiferromagnetiki. Moscow, 1965.



(solid-state physics)
A property possessed by some metals, alloys, and salts of transition elements by which the atomic magnetic moments form an ordered array which alternates or spirals so as to give no net total moment in zero applied magnetic field.
References in periodicals archive ?
1 Low-Dimensional Antiferromagnetic Oxides: An Overview (Marco Finazzi, Lamberto Duo, and Franco Ciccacci).
2 Growth of Antiferromagnetic Oxide Thin Films (Sergio Valeri, Salvatore Altieri, and Paola Luches).
Now, researchers from NIST, Korea University and the University of Notre Dame have supported theories that thin magnetic layers of semiconductor material could exhibit antiferromagnetic coupling.
The discovery of antiferromagnetic coupling in metals was the basis of the 2007 Nobel Prize in Physics.
The antiferromagnetic material in Nogues' experiment, cobalt oxide, is easy to study in the lab but wouldn't be useful for industrial applications since it loses its antiferromagnetic properties above 17[degrees]C, Noguds notes.
The intrinsic resonances that do occur are primarily antiferromagnetic, ferromagnetic, water vapor and oxygen absorption bands, surface wave and plasma resonances, and atomic transitions.
We acknowledge discussions with team members of the Innovation Measurements Science Program at NIST: Detection of Corrosion in Steel-Reinforced Concrete by Antiferromagnetic Resonance, discussions with Nick Paulter of OLES, and Pavel Kabos and many other over the years.
Because crystalline hematite has a weak ferromagnetic resonance caused by canting of its anti-ferromagnetically-paired iron spins at 48 GHz and 290 K (8), we anticipate that such resonances may be observable in the polycrystalline iron oxides of corrosion in the range of 30 GHz to 50 GHz and particularly in our antiferromagnetic powders of hematite and goethite.
The solid curve is a profile refinement of both the antiferromagnetic and crystallographic structure for the sample, and the experimental intensities are indicated by the open circles.
At room temperature, the compound has a magnetically ordered lattice with reduced symmetry and two antiferromagnetic sublattices.
The coupling angles measured for Fe/Mn/Fe(001) tri-layers, using scanning electron microscopy with polarization analysis (SEMPA), were in approximate agreement with the predictions of the so-called torsion model, developed to describe the more complicated interlayer coupling when exchange coupling within the antiferromagnetic spacer is important.
The conducting ferromagnetic and insulating antiferromagnetic phases coexist in intimately mixed small domains down to 5 K, the lowest temperature measured.