![]() 990,108,765 visitors served. |
|
![]() Dictionary/ thesaurus | ![]() Medical dictionary | ![]() Legal dictionary | ![]() Financial dictionary | ![]() Acronyms | ![]() Idioms | ![]() Encyclopedia | ![]() Wikipedia encyclopedia | ? |
implication |
Also found in: Dictionary/thesaurus, Wikipedia | 0.07 sec. |
implicationIn logic, a relation that holds between two propositions when they are linked as antecedent and consequent of a true conditional proposition. Logicians distinguish two main types of implication, material and strict. Proposition p materially implies proposition q if and only if the material conditional p ⊃ q (read “if p then q”) is true. A proposition of the form p ⊃ q is false whenever p is true and q is false; it is true in the other three possible cases (i.e., p true and q true; p false and q true; p false and q false). It follows that whenever p is false, p ⊃ q is automatically true: this is a peculiarity that makes the material conditional inadequate as an interpretation of the meaning of conditional sentences in ordinary English. On the other hand, proposition p strictly implies proposition q if and only if it is impossible for p to be true without q also being true (i.e., if the conjunction of p and not-q is impossible). |
|
? Mentioned in | ? References in periodicals archive | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| In particular, this paper is closely related to the notion of conditional testing approach proposed by Pettengill et al (1995) and the subsequent works by Fletzer (1997), Hodoshima (2000), Elsas et al (1999) in the light of having the conditional relation between beta and return. |
| Free Tools: |
For surfers:
Browser extension |
Word of the Day |
Help
For webmasters: Free content NEW! | Linking | Lookup box | Double-click lookup | Partner with us |
|
|---|