hearsay

(redirected from hearsay rule)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Financial, Wikipedia.

hearsay:

see evidenceevidence,
in law, material submitted to a judge or a judicial body to resolve disputed questions of fact. The rules discussed in this article were developed in England for use in jury trials.
..... Click the link for more information.
.
References in periodicals archive ?
88) There are about thirty exceptions to the hearsay rule, but only a
The article will then briefly discuss, in Part IV, the hearsay rule and some of the exceptions that have been the subject of confusion for appellate courts.
137) If a court finds statements to a SANE were made with a primary medical purpose, the statements would be non-testimonial and thus potentially admissible subject only to hearsay rules.
253) The centuries-old approach of admitting hearsay under exceptions based on reliability and necessity implies the weakness of Crawford's treatment of reliability as irrelevant, since the history of the hearsay rule and the Confrontation Clause are intertwined, even if they are not identical.
Crawford separated the hearsay rules from the confrontation rights); see
The trial court barred introduction of the deposition, but certified the question, "Whether the Estate of a deceased party can introduce the discovery deposition of the deceased party as evidence at trial as an exception to the hearsay rule under [Rule] 212(a)(3) in light of the language in [Rule] 212(a)(5).
It will only be admissible if it qualifies as an exception to the hearsay rule as provided in the Law of Evidence Amendment Act (Hofman, 2006, p.
Parts II and III of the Article explain why the hearsay rule serves as an essential barrier to conviction and why cross-examination and confrontation are indispensable to exposing flaws in the credibility of witnesses.
After examining and rejecting several theories for the admissibility of party statements for reasons other than as exceptions to the hearsay rule, (61) Professor Edmund M.
As courts continue to define the contours of the Sixth Amendment, the same concerns that led the Court to sever the hearsay rule from the Confrontation Clause will eventually require it to address whether the admission of testimonial summary exhibits raises Confrontation Clause concerns when the defendant is not afforded the opportunity to confront the individuals who made the assertions contained in the summaries.
The doctrine is one of six exceptions to the hearsay rule under the Federal Rules of Evidence.