industrial democracy


Also found in: Dictionary, Financial, Wikipedia.

industrial democracy

the participation of employees in the decision-making of a work organization. The participation may be total or shared with owner and managerial interests. Moreover, the decision-making may concern the organization as a whole, or only sub-groups within it. The main types are workers’ self-management (e.g. the former Yugoslavia), producer cooperatives (e.g. Mondragon in the Basque province of Spain), and codetermination (e.g. Germany). At the shop-floor (i.e. sub-group) level, the creation of autonomous work groups and quality of working life programmes are examples of industrial democracy of a partial kind (Poole, 1986).

The general concept of industrial democracy has been much criticized by both pluralist and Marxist writers. The pluralist argument is that participation in management dilutes trade unions’ ability to represent their members effectively in collective bargaining (Clegg, 1960). The pluralist critique amounts to an alternative definition of industrial democracy based upon opposition (through collective bargaining) rather than participation (see also COUNTERVAILING POWER, PLURALISM).

The Marxist criticism is that it is not possible within a capitalist society to incrementally gain workers’ control through employee participation in business enterprises (Hyman, 1984).

Historically, industrial democracy has its roots in French syndicalism which influenced early socialist thinking and trade unionism in the US and UK in the early decades of the 20th century. In the UK, the movement transmuted into guild socialism in the inter-war years (Pribicevic, 1959) and reappeared as a force in the 1960s largely as a consequence of the agitation of the Institute of Workers’ Control (Coates and Topham, 1972). This group was active in supporting the establishment of cooperatives and worker directors on the boards of nationalized industries. In the UK, however, the biggest impetus towards implementing industrial democracy on a wide scale came in the 1970s, with the publication of the draft Fifth Directive of the EEC Commission in 1972. The British government's response was to set up the Bullock Committee of Inquiry on Industrial Democracy. This committee's principal recommendation was that workers should be represented, via trade union channels, on all companies employing over 2,000 workers. The proposals, however, were almost wholly ignored as none of the interested parties (government, employers, trade unions) found the recommendations palatable to them. In the 1980s there was (managerial) interest in participation on management's terms (i.e. quality circles) and in some extension of ownership through share schemes.

References in periodicals archive ?
I became hooked on the twin concepts of industrial democracy and profit sharing.
A modern-day industrial democracy is about as realistic as self-lacing shoes, flying cars, and holographic movies (all courtesy of 1989's "Back to the Future II" augurs).
From the concept of "school shop" to broad education about the industrial democracy, industrial arts in the 1960s seems to have had its period in the educational sun.
Since the crisis in social democracy--or at least the specific form social democracy took around the turn of the twenty-first century which is pretty transactional, and driven by growth--some of those ideas about industrial democracy and the role of trade unions are becoming once more of interest.
So far, the historiography has read this event only in the context of the Cold War, but this point of view does not explain all those matters that persisted in the Italian Labor market: today's policies for productivity, the new collective bargaining reforms and the problems of industrial democracy are just some examples that demonstrate that at the end of the Cold War the same issues remained.
As Jim Callaghan cogitated lengthily over whether or not to reform other parts of company law, and the pre-SDP Liberals hedged their bets over an early election, the Winter of Discontent arrived and the prospect of industrial democracy sunk down the agenda (Sandbrook, 2012).
1951), Industrial Democracy and Nationalization: A Study Prepared for the Fabian Society.
Where you stood on the concept of industrial democracy depended upon whether you sat in a passenger coach or a boxcar.
Tyomkina (1993) suggests the following summary of areas of research: industrial democracy, workplace democracy, economic democracy, participatory democracy, participation in management, participation in industry, and organizational democracy.
In these circumstances Unite are wholly justified that this is a judicial undermining of very clear industrial democracy.
Kleiner reveals intriguing histories of men like Kurt Lewin, a psychology professor who founded the National Training Laboratories; Eric Trist, who popularized the notion of industrial democracy on the assembly line; and Pierre Wack, a consultant and then executive with Royal Dutch Shell who studied with mystics and nurtured employees with unusual perception and depth of understanding.

Full browser ?