# integral calculus

Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Wikipedia.

Related to integral calculus: differential calculus

## integral calculus:

see calculus**calculus,**

branch of mathematics that studies continuously changing quantities. The calculus is characterized by the use of infinite processes, involving passage to a limit—the notion of tending toward, or approaching, an ultimate value.

**.....**Click the link for more information. .

## Integral Calculus

a branch of mathematics that studies the properties of and methods of computing integrals and their applications. The integral calculus is closely connected with the differential calculus and together with the latter constitutes one of the fundamental parts of mathematical analysis (or the analysis of infinitesimals). Central to the integral calculus are the concepts of the definite integral and indefinite integral of a function of a single real variable.

** Definite integral.** Suppose we are required to compute the area

*S*of a “curvilinear trapezoid”—figure

*ABCD*(see Figure 1)— bounded by the continuous curve

*y = f (x)*, by the interval

*AB*on the axis of the abscissas, and by the two ordinates

*AD*and

*BC*. In order to calculate the area

*S*, we divide the base

*AB*(the interval [

*a,b*]) into

*n*subintervals (not necessarily equal) by means of points

*a*= x

_{0}< x

_{1}< … < x

_{n}. 1 <

*x*, and designate their lengths by Δx

_{n}= b_{1}, Δx

_{2}, …, Δx

_{n}. On each of these subintervals we construct rectangles with altitudes

*f*(ξ

_{1}),

*f*(ξ

_{2}),…,

*f*(ξ

_{n}), where ξ

_{k}is a point in the subinterval [

*x*–

_{k}_{1},

*x*] (in Figure 1 the rectangle on the

_{k}*k*th subinterval is shaded;

*f*(ξ

_{k}) is its altitude). The sum

*S*of the areas of the rectangles is regarded as an approximation to the area 5 of the curvilinear trapezoid:

_{n}*s≈ s _{n}* =

*f*(ξ

_{1})Δx

_{1}+

*f*(ξ

_{2})Δx

_{2}+ … +

*f*(ξ

_{n})Δx

_{n}

Using the summation symbol Σ (the Greek letter “sigma”) we write, for brevity,

The smaller the lengths Δx_{k} of the subintervals, the more exact is the above expression for the area of the curvilinear trapezoid. In order to find the exact value of the area *S*, it is necessary to find the limit of the sums *S _{n}* as the number of points of subdivision increases without bound and the largest of the lengths Δx

_{k}tends to zero.

Setting aside the geometric content of our considerations, we arrive at the concept of the definite integral of a function *f(x)*, continuous on the interval [*a, b*], as the limit, in the sense just described, of the integral sums *S _{n}*. This integral is denoted by

The symbol J (an elongated S—the first letter of the word *summa)* is called the integral sign,*f(x)* is the integrand, and the numbers *a* and *b* are the lower and upper limits of the definite integral. If *a = b*, then by definition,

Again, by definition,

The following are properties of the definite integral:

where *k* is a constant. It is also evident that

(The numerical value of the definite integral does not depend on the choice of designation for the variable of integration.)

Problems of finding areas bounded by curves (“quadrature” problems), lengths of arcs of curves (“rectification of curves”), surface areas of solids, and volumes of solids (“cubature” calculations) are all reduced to the calculation of definite integrals as are problems of determining the coordinates of centers of gravity, moments of inertia, the trajectory of a body from its known velocity of motion, the work produced by a force, and many other problems of natural science and technology. For example, the arc length of the plane curve defined by the equation *y = f(x)* on the interval [*a, b*] is expressed by the integral

The volume of the solid generated by rotating this arc about the x-axis is expressed by the integral

and the surface area of that solid by the integral

The actual computation of definite integrals is accomplished by various methods. In certain cases the definite integral may be found by directly computing the limit of the corresponding integral sums. However, for the most part, such a passage to the limit is cumbersome. Some definite integrals may be computed by finding an indefinite integral first (*see below:* Indefinite integral). But as a rule, it is necessary to resort to an approximate calculation of definite integrals using various quadrature formulas (for example, the trapezoidal rule, Simpson’s rule). Such approximate calculations may be carried out on a computer with an absolute error not exceeding any given small positive number. In cases not requiring great accuracy, graphic methods are used for the approximate calculation of definite integrals.

The concept of the definite integral is extended to the case of unbounded intervals of integration as well as to certain classes of unbounded functions. Such generalizations are called improper integrals.

Expressions of the form

where the function *f(x,a)* is continuous in *x*, are said to be parameter-dependent integrals. They serve as fundamental means for studying many special functions (for example, the gamma function).

** Indefinite integral.** The finding of indefinite integrals, or integration, is the inverse operation of differentiation. In differentiating a given function, we are seeking its derivative. In integration, we are seeking the antiderivative (or primitive) function—a function whose derivative is equal to the given function. Thus the function

*F(x)*is an antiderivative for a given function

*f(x)*if

*F’(x) = f(x)*or, which is the same thing, if

*dF(x) = f(x) dx*. A given function

*f(x)*may have different an-tiderivatives, but all of these differ from one another only by a constant. Therefore, all antiderivatives of

*f(x)*are contained in the expression

*F(x) + C*, which is called the indefinite integral of the function

*f(x)*and is written as

∫ *f(x) dx = F(x) + C*

The definite integral viewed as a function of the upper limit of integration

(“integral with a variable upper limit”) is one of the antiderivatives of the integrand. This yields the fundamental formula of the integral calculus (the Newton-Leibniz formula):

which expresses the numerical value of the definite integral as the difference of the values of any antiderivative of the integrand at the upper and lower limits of integration.

The mutually inverse character of the operations of integration and differentiation is expressed by the equalities

*d∫f(x) dx = f(x) dx ∫dF(x) = F(x) + C*

This leads to the possibility of obtaining formulas and rules for integration from corresponding formulas and rules for differentiation (see Table 1, where *C, m, a*, and *k* are constants and *m* ≠ – 1 and *a* > 0).

Unlike derivatives, integrals of elementary functions cannot always be expressed in terms of elementary functions; they cannot be expressed “in closed form.” Each of the available methods of integration in closed form has a limited area of applicability (integration methods are set forth in textbooks on mathematical analysis; comprehensive tables of integrals are given in many handbooks).

The class of functions whose integrals can be expressed through elementary functions includes the rational functions

where *P(x)* and *Q(x)* are polynomials. Many functions that are not rational are also integrable in closed form, for example, functions rationally dependent on and *x* or on *x* and rational powers of *(ax* + *b*)/(*cx* + *d*). Many transcendental functions are also integrable in closed form, for example, rational functions of sine and cosine. Functions represented by indefinite integrals that cannot be expressed in closed form are new transcendental functions. Many of these have been studied in detail (for example, the logarithmic integral, sine integral, cosine integral, exponential integral).

The concept of the integral can be extended to functions of several real variables as well as to functions of a complex variable and to vector functions.

*(See*INTEGRAL for extensions and generalizations of the concept of the integral.)

** Historical notes.** The integral calculus arose in connection with problems of determining areas and volumes. A number of problems of this kind were solved by ancient Greek mathematicians, who anticipated the ideas of the integral calculus to a significantly greater degree than those of the differential calculus. A large role in the solution of such problems was played by the method of exhaustion, which was established by Eudoxus of Cnidus and was used widely by Archimedes. However, Archimedes did not isolate the common content of the methods of integration or the concept of the integral and, furthermore, did not establish the algorithms of the integral calculus. The scholars of the Middle and Near East in the ninth to 15th centuries studied and translated the works of Archimedes into Arabic but did not obtain substantially new results in the area of the integral calculus. The work of European scholars during this time was even more modest. Only in the 16th and 17th centuries did the development of natural science in Europe give rise to new problems, in particular, problems on determining quadratures, cuba-tures, and centers of gravity. The works of Archimedes, first published in 1544 (in Latin and Greek), began attracting wide attention, and their study was one of the most important starting points for the further development of the integral calculus. The classical method of “indivisibles” was revived by J. Kepler. In more general form, the ideas behind this method were developed by B. Cavalieri, E. Torricelli, J. Wallis, and B. Pascal. A number of geometric and mechanical problems were solved by the method of indivisibles. To this same period belong the subsequently published works of P. Fermat on the quadrature of parabolas of the

*n*th degree and later the works of C. Huygens on the rectification of curves.

As a result of these studies, the common features of the methods of integration used in the solution of outwardly dissimilar geometric and physical problems became apparent. This led to quadratures being viewed as the geometric equivalent of the definite integral. The final link in the chain of discoveries of this period was the establishment of the mutually inverse connection between problems of tangent construction and quadrature problems, that is, between differentiation and integration. The principal concepts and algorithms of the integral calculus were formulated independently by Newton and Leibniz. The term “integral calculus” and the designation of the integral by ∫ *y**dx* were introduced by Leibniz.

Moreover, the concept of the indefinite integral (fluents) played a fundamental role in Newton’s works, whereas Leibniz proceeded from the concept of the definite integral. The further development of the integral calculus in the 18th century was the work of Johann Bernoulli and especially L. Euler. At the beginning of the 19th century, A. Cauchy based the integral and differential calculus on the theory of limits. The Russian mathematicians M. V. Ostrogradskii, V. Ia. Buniakovskii, and P. L. Chebyshev contributed to the development of the integral calculus in the 19th century. By the 20th century, the development of set theory and the theory of functions of a real variable led to a deepening and generalization of the fundamental concepts of the integral calculus as represented in the work of B. Riemann, H. Lebesgue, and others.

### REFERENCES

*History*Van der Waerden, B. L.

*Probuzhdaiushchaiasia nauka*. Moscow, 1959. (Translated from Dutch.).

Wileitner, H.

*Istoriia matematiki ot Dekarta do serediny 19 stoletiia*, 2nd ed. Moscow, 1966. (Translated from German.)

Struik, D. J.

*Kratkii ocherk istorii matematiki*, 2nd ed. Moscow, 1969. (Translated from German.)

Cantor, M.

*Vorlesungen über Geschichte der Mathematik*, 2nd ed., vols. 3–4. Leipzig-Berlin, 1901–24.

*Works by the founders and classical figures of integral calculus*Newton, I.

*Matematicheskie raboty*. Moscow-Leningrad, 1937. (Translated from Latin.)

Leibniz, G. von. “Izbrannye otryvki iz matematicheskikh sochinenii.”

*Uspekhi matematicheskikh nauk*, 1948, vol. 3, issue 1. (Translated from Latin.)

Euler, L.

*Integral’noe ischislenie*, vols. 1–3. Moscow, 1956–58. (Translated from Latin.)

Cauchy, A. L.

*Kratkoe izlozhenie urokov o differentsial’nom i integral’ nom ischislenii*. St. Petersburg, 1831. (Translated from French.)

Cauchy, A. L.

*Algebraicheskii analiz*. Leipzig, 1864. (Translated from French.)

*Textbooks and handbooks on integral calculus*Khinchin, A. Ia.

*Kratkii kurs matematicheskogo analiza*, 3rd ed., 1957.

Smirnov, V. I.

*Kurs vysshei matematiki*, 22nd ed., vol. 1. Moscow, 1967.

Fikhtengol’ts, G. M.

*Kurs differenlsial’nogo i integral’nogo ischisleniia*, 7th ed., vol. 2. Moscow, 1969.

Il’in, V., and E. G. Pozniak.

*Osnovy matematicheskogo analiza*, 3rd ed., part 1. Moscow, 1971.

Courant, R.

*Kurs differentsial’nogo i integral’nogo ischisleniia*, 4th ed., vol. 1. Moscow, 1967. (Translated from German and English.)

Dwight, H. B.

*Tablitsy integralov i drugie matematicheskie formuly*. Moscow, 1964. (Translated from English.)

Under the editorship of Academician