Adversary Procedure

(redirected from Adversarial system)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Legal, Wikipedia.

Adversary Procedure


(law), a principle of judicial procedure by virtue of which a case is essentially a contest before the court, each party defending its claims and allegations and disputing the claims and allegations of the other.

An expression of socialist democracy in the Soviet administration of justice, adversary procedure is followed in every criminal trial. The court that hears the case does not officially make the accusation. Rather, the accusation is made by an accuser, such as a procurator, civic prosecutor, or victim, who is also a party to the case. The defendant (the accused, under indictment) is the other party, defending himself against the accusation, personally and with the assistance of counsel. The court decides the case. Thus, the basic procedural functions are divided among the court and the parties to the case.

In part because of adversary procedure, criminal cases can be decided justly and fairly, the true facts of the case established, and the rights of all parties protected. Adversary procedure enables the court, in its investigation of the case, to hear, before passing sentence, all evidence pro and contra the accusation and to consider all the circumstances in the case, both aggravating and extenuating.

In a Soviet civil trial, adversary procedure is likewise followed. The entire trial takes the form of a contest between parties—the plaintiff and the defendant, both of whom present their case personally or with the help of counsel. Each party provides the court with evidence and explanations in support of its claims and objections; each has equal procedural rights. The court does not content itself with the materials and explanations presented; rather, it must take all steps provided for in law in order to obtain a comprehensive, full, and objective account of the real circumstances of the case and to make clear the rights and obligations of all parties.

In the law of the bourgeois states, adversary procedure is proclaimed as one of the democratic principles of the judicial process. However, complex court procedures and the de facto inequality of the parties make it difficult for the principle to be realized in practice and, in a trial, confer the advantage on the representatives of the ruling class.


Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
85) A useful comparison of the American adversarial system with the French inquisitorial system is conducted by Geraldine Szott Moohr in her article, Prosecutorial Power in an Adversarial System: Lessons from Current White Collar Cases and the Inquisitorial Model.
to be quite offensive to the adversarial system was that of the
91) The adversarial system vests authority in a neutral decision maker (the judge or jury), who renders a verdict in light of the materials presented by the adversarial parties (i.
McHugh has also recently underlined the difficulties the adversarial system cause historians and social scientists.
evidence more rigorously than they would be in an adversarial system.
Preparation is one means to ensure your advocacy meets the standards demanded by our adversarial system.
This is not supposed to be an adversarial system, but that's the way it feels--like another battle to fight.
I was involved in the adversarial system and became disillusioned with what I had accomplished as a lawyer.
Last week Mr Clarke told MPs that an investigatory justice system like that in France was "very superior" to the traditional British adversarial system.
sentencing reform in a properly functioning adversarial system.
Arguing that the adversarial system is incompatible with the search for the truth, McEwan views Britain's legal reform as a method of ensuring that reliable evidence is brought before court.
There is a sense that for any idea to be debated in the House it has to be pre-boiled and managed; stage-managed and coordinated or else the core adversarial system upon which Parliament is based will somehow be at risk.