analysis of variance

(redirected from Annova)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Financial.
Related to Annova: ANOVA

analysis of variance

[ə¦nal·ə·səs əv ′ver·ē·əns]
A method for partitioning the total variance in experimental data into components assignable to specific sources.
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific & Technical Terms, 6E, Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

analysis of variance (ANOVA)

(STATISTICS) a procedure used to test whether differences between the MEANS of several groups are likely to be found in the population from which those groups were drawn. An example might be three groups of people with different educational backgrounds for whom the mean wage level has been calculated. ANOVA provides a way of testing whether the differences between the means are statistically significant by dividing the variability of the observations into two types. One type, called ‘within group’ variability, is the VARIANCE within each group in the SAMPLE. The second type is the variability between the group means (‘between groups’ variability). If this is large compared to the ‘within group’ variability it is likely that the population’s means are not equal.

The assumptions underlying the use of analysis of variance are:

  1. each group must be a RANDOM SAMPLE from a normal population (see NORMAL DISTRIBUTION);
  2. the variance of the groups in the population are equal.

However, the technique is robust and can be used even if the normality and equal variance assumptions do not hold. The random sample condition is nevertheless essential. See also SIGNIFICANCE TEST.

Collins Dictionary of Sociology, 3rd ed. © HarperCollins Publishers 2000
The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.

Analysis of Variance


a statistical method in mathematics for determining the effect of separate factors on the result of an experiment. Analysis of variance was first proposed by the British statistician R. A. Fisher in 1925 for analyzing results of agricultural experiments designed to reveal under what conditions a specific agricultural crop provided a maximum yield. Modern applications of analysis of variance encompass a broad range of problems in economics, biology, and technology and are generally interpreted in terms of a statistical theory for determining systematic variations among the results of measurements made under the influence of several varying factors.

If the values of the unknown constants a1, … , an could be measured by various methods or means of measurement M1, …, Mm and, in each instance, a systematic error could depend on the selected method as well as on the unknown value of ai being measured, then the results of the measurements xij are represented as sums of the form

xij = ai + bij + δiji 1, 2, ... , = n; j = 1, 2, ... , m

where bij is a systematic error arising during the measurement of a1 by method Mi, and δij is a random error. Such a model is called a two-factor layout of analysis of variance (the first factor is the quantity being measured and the second, the method of measurement). Variances in the empirical distributions, corresponding to the sets of random values


are expressed by the formulas

These variances satisfy the identity =

s2 = s02 + s12 + s22

which also explains the origin of the term “analysis of variance.”

If the values of systematic errors do not depend on the method of measurement (that is, there are no systematic variations among the methods of measurement), then the ratio s22/s02 is close to 1. This property is the basic criterion for the statistical determination of systematic variations. If s22 differs significantly from 1, then the hypothesis about the absence of systematic variations is rejected. The significance of the difference is determined according to the probability distribution of the random errors in the measurements. Specifically, if all measurements are of equal accuracy and the random errors are normally distributed, then the critical values for the ratio s22/s02 are determined by F -distribution tables (distribution of the variance ratio).

The above scheme allows only for detecting the existence of systematic variations and, generally speaking, is not suitable for their numerical evaluation with subsequent elimination from the observed results. Such evaluation may be achieved only through numerous measurements (with repeated applications of the described scheme).


Scheffe, H. Dispersionnyi analiz. Moscow, 1963. (Translated from English.)
Smirnov, N. V., and I. V. Dunin-Barkovskii. Kurs teorii veroiatnostei i matematicheskoi statistiki dlia tekhnicheskikh prilozhenii, 2nd ed. Moscow, 1965.


The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
Kruskal Wallis ANNOVA depicted that earthen pots (indoors) were the most abundant containers harbouring Aedes pupae (Kruskal Wallis statistic, K= 33.6, p <0.001).
While the ANNOVA table is a useful test of the model's ability to explain any variation in the dependent variable, it does not directly address the strength of that relationship.
In order to use parametric ANNOVA test, I verified that the following conditions were achieved:
One Way annova test to determine the difference among the groups and Tukey HSD test to find out the originating group of the difference have been applied.
1 are compared in is possible to discern threads of the scientific methodology running through the engineering methodology (Anna, V., Annova, V., 1984).
Since the start of 2019, SCISYS' Media & Broadcast and Annova Systems units have operated in combination under a single management team as the Media Solutions division.
The data were presented as mean +- SD and analyzed by Analysis of variance (ANNOVA) and performed with Duncan's Multiple Range Test.
ANNOVA analysis is used for finding the significant factors affecting the machining process in order to improve the surface characteristics of Inconel-825 material.
ANNOVA with Tukey's minimum significant difference and Spearman Rho correlation were used considering pless than 0.05 significant.
There was no significant difference in the highest level of sensory blocks achieved among the groups (p> 0.05) calculated by applying ANNOVA test (A-B, A-C and B-C) (Table-2).