Baron de Montesquieu

Montesquieu, Baron de

 

(Charles-Louis de Secondat; Baron de la Brede). Born Jan. 18, 1689, at the Chateau of La Bèpde, near Bordeaux; died Feb. 10, 1755, in Paris. French Enlightenment thinker, lawyer, philosopher, and writer. Member of the Institut de France (1727).

Montesquieu was born into an old noble family. After graduating from a Catholic collège in 1705, he studied law in Bordeaux and Paris. In 1714 he became a counselor of the Bordeaux parlement (high court in prerevolutionary France) and in 1716 a deputy president. In 1726 he moved to Paris.

Montesquieu traveled through Europe in 1728, visiting Italy, Prussia, and the Netherlands. From 1729 to 1731 he lived in Great Britain. British constitutional practice and the views of British lawyers and philosophers greatly influenced the development of his political and legal ideals, which are most vividly expressed in The Spirit of Laws (1748; Russian translation, 1900), an encyclopedic work based on extensive use of comparative and comparative historical methods. He attributed great importance to geographic factors, especially climate, in explaining the development of positive law and forms of government. In his opinion, for example, a hot climate gives rise to both laziness and passion, destroys civic honor, and is the breeding ground of despotic governments. Because of this emphasis Montesquieu is considered one of the founders of the geographic school of sociology. Nonetheless, he attributed the greatest importance to political factors, particularly the form of government.

The fundamental theme of The Spirit of Laws is the problem of a rational political system and its organization. Drawing on classical political theories, Montesquieu asserted that there are three proper forms of government (democracy, aristocracy, and monarchy) and one improper form (despotism). He considered monarchy the best form of government. To prevent its transformation into despotism and to secure political freedom, he proposed the principle of the separation of powers, as well as a federal form of government. As a critic of royal despotism and exponent of constitutional monarchy, he played a significant role in French history and in the development of international social thought. In general, his political program called for compromise between the bourgeoisie and the nobility on the conditions of joint participation in exercising political authority. Montesquieu was incapable of providing a genuine scientific differentiation of the various forms of government. Noting the inaccuracies in his distinction between monarchy and despotism, K. Marx wrote that “those are names for one and the same concept, and at most they denote differences in customs though the principle remains the same “(K. Marx and F. Engels, Soch., 2nd ed., vol. 1, pp. 374–75).

In law Montesquieu advanced a number of progressive principles: equality of all citizens before the law, broad suffrage, freedom of speech, press, and worship, separation of church and state, elimination of torture and harsh punishment, and the need for international agreements to humanize war.

His ideas were used extensively by C. Beccaria, who advanced new principles of criminal law. The theory of the separation of powers exerted a great influence on the American Constitution (1787) and the French Constitution of 1791.

Montesquieu’s historical views were expressed in Considerations on the Causes of the Grandeur of the Romans and of Their Decadence (1734). Rejecting the theological interpretation of history, he advanced the thesis of the objective regularity of the historical process.

Although The Spirit of Laws was included in the Index of Forbidden Books, 22 editions of it were published between 1748 and 1750 alone, and it was translated into almost every European language. In Russia the first translations, neither of which is extant, were done by A. D. Kantemir and A. N. Radishchev.

The novel The Persian Letters (1721; Russian translation 1789), one of the best works in the philosophical genre characteristic of the 18th century, won Montesquieu fame as a writer. The novel takes the form of a correspondence between two friends, the Persians Usbek and Rica, who are at once “naive “and wise critics of French secular society, which they criticize for the arrogance bred by the empty trumpery of French “civilization. “Essential aspects of this civilization, as perceived by the novel’s protagonists, are superstition, oppression by the church and authorities, learning that is out of touch with reality, and art that consists of rhetorical glorifications, conventionalities, and extreme affectation. Pervaded by irony and subtle wit, Montesquieu’s satire completely unmasked France’s absolute monarchy, as well as French political life, culture, customs and manners.

The Temple of Gnide (1725) and A Journey to Paphos (1727), narrative poems in prose, are written in the spirit of the hedonistic Epicureanism of the aristocratic salon and boudoir, whose favorite mythological characters and erotic subjects they borrow.

Montesquieu’s “Essay on Taste, “written 1753 and published in the fourth volume of Diderot’s Encyclopedia (1757), is confined to the traditions of classicism. However, although he emerged as an advocate of order, symmetry, rationality, and clarity in art, Montesquieu also understood the delightful effects of ingenuous charm and of the unexpected and the carefree.

WORKS

Oeuvres complètes, 3 vols. Paris, 1950–55.
Correspondance, 2 vols. Paris, 1914.
In Russian translation: Izbr. proizv. Moscow, 1955.
Dukh zakonov. St. Petersburg, 1900.
Persidskie pis’ma. Moscow, 1956.

REFERENCES

Marx, K., and F. Engels. Soch., 2nd ed., vol. 1, p. 374.
Ibid., vol. 5, p. 203.
Istoriia frantsuzskoi literatury, vol. 1. Moscow, 1946.
Baskin, M. P. Montesk’e. Moscow, 1965.
Shackleton, R. Montesquieu: A Critical Biography. Oxford, 1961. Starobinsky, J. Montesquieu par lui-même. Paris, 1963.
Loy, J. Robert. Montesquieu. New York, 1968.
Etudes sur Montesquieu. [Paris, 1970.]
Cabeen, D. C. Montesquieu: A Bibliography. New York, 1947.
Cabeen, D. C. “A Supplementary Montesquieu Bibliography. “Revue Internationale de philosophic, 1955, nos. 33–34.

Z. M. CHERNILOVSKII and V. I. EFIMOV

References in periodicals archive ?
Este proceso de transformacion aprovecharia el sentido sagrado que le infundia el lector de aquel entonces al concepto de "voluntad de Dios" para trasladarlo a la voluntad del ciudadano, creando asi una religion civil que completase el trabajo del Baron de Montesquieu (1689-1755) (p.
Taking the Baron de Montesquieu as a kind of guide, Manent proposes a new science of political forms, a term that he distinguishes rigorously from the regime.
El Baron de Montesquieu esboza diversas consideraciones que sustentan la necesidad de la division de poderes entre diversos titulares.
Sobre sus creencias y vida intelectual, Londono nos presenta la devocion de Varela a la Virgen del Carmen, y su avida lectura de formacion autodidacta que incluye Las mil y una noches y Los miserables de Victor Hugo, asi como libros religiosos y otros de corte mas liberal que incluyen El contrato social de Jean-Jacques Rousseau y El espiritu de las leyes del Baron de Montesquieu.
They first outline a theoretical framework and philosophical paradigm for their study and analyze the emotional dimension of the law and the limitations of the law and the social contract, while detailing the influential writings of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Baron de Montesquieu and how property, personhood, and citizenship have been defined and manipulated to violate minority groups and elevate the status of corporations.
Inherent in the struggle to realize these goals and the Declaration itself, are the warnings of the Baron de Montesquieu that "constant experience shows us that every man invested with power is apt to abuse it, and to carry his authority as far as it will go.
The author builds his case against the president not only from American and English legal precedents but from the writings of political philosophers who inspired these legal works notably John Locke who called for the removal of a monarch who failed to protect the people's rights of safety and liberty and Baron de Montesquieu who advocated the separation of powers especially a separate judiciary not controlled by the king.
Su obra influyo en el pensamiento de contemporaneos como el Baron de Montesquieu y David Hume.
Studying this checkered past with care, both Niccolo Machiavelli (whom some see as the founder of realism) and Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu (who could be considered a founder of liberal internationalism), sought ways to combine the security advantages of large empires with the freedom (from military rule especially) of healthy republics.
Although their principal referents harked back to Aristotle's Politics and ancient Rome, these men--most well known, such as David Hume, the Baron de Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, but some less so, like Francois Veron de Forbonnais and Pierre-Louis Roederer--knew their own times differed markedly as a result of the rise of commercial capitalism and its attendant social values.
In 1742, Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu, wrote: "There is no crueler tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of law and in the name of justice.
I'll bet (pun) Baron de Montesquieu, in writing his great treatise The Spirit of the Laws on governments in 1748, found the seed of his idea of a tripartite government with its accompanying checks and balances from this game.

Full browser ?