best-effort service

best-effort service

A communications service that makes no guarantees regarding the speed with which data will be transmitted to the recipient or that the data will even be delivered entirely.
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
(122) (See Box 6: The Relationship Between Congestion, Delay, Jitter, and Loss below.) A network that offers Quality of Service can "help" these applications by providing classes of service that may offer throughput, delay, loss, or jitter that are better suited to the needs of QoS-sensitive applications than the unpredictable and potentially highly variable throughput, delay, loss, and jitter offered by the best-effort service. (123) Potential classes of service may offer throughput, loss, delay, or jitter that is relatively better than the throughput, loss, delay, or jitter provided by best-effort service during times of congestion (124) or may provide a performance that is more constant and predictable than best-effort service.
The definition of a best-effort service with minimum QoS levels is also part of the network neutrality debate (CAVE & CROCIONI, 2011).
Although the above mentioned methods improve the efficiency of packet delivery by minimizing the handoff latency, they provide only the best-effort service offered by the parent protocol IP.
* SMS is a best-effort service. This means that, although the system will attempt to deliver your message, there is no guarantee, and messages sometimes do get lost.
The service, named Group-Ether, is a best-effort service offering low-cost nationwide network coverage by taking advantage of broadband access lines that NTT Com's sister companies NTT East and NTT West provide with certain versions of their FLET'S-branded Internet access services.
In order to preserve the reliability and QoS for business applications, enterprises should enable the WLAN system's QoS features for critical voice, data and video applications on the corporate ESSID, while providing best-effort service for the guest ESSID.
Even for best-effort service (i.e., where the network provides no guarantees about service quality) [2], a user will not wait indefinitely in the face of long packet-transmission times that occur in a very congested network.
From a service management perspective, prices provide a way to facilitate differential services so that those who need high QoS can be provided with that--this simply is not a possibility with TCP/IP's best-effort service. Furthermore, there is a question of incentives; with purely application-based QoS approaches there is nothing stopping customers from developing software "masking" solutions in which an application requiring low QoS can behave like an application requiring a higher QoS.
Without QoS, TCP/IP networks provide only a best-effort service that provides bandwidth on a first-come, first-served basis.
A key goal would be a system that supports both the reliable delivery of scheduled, priority traffic while retaining the great economies of first-come-first-served, best-effort service for the remainder.
Is best-effort service good enough to build a robust global data network?
UBR connections receive best-effort service only and lack QoS guarantees that control transmission characteristics like cell loss and delay.