Canaanite Languages

(redirected from Canaanite language)

Canaanite Languages


the languages of the Semites who inhabited the region between the Mediterranean Sea and Mesopotamia in the third and second millennia B.C. A number of scholars believe that the Canaanite languages included Old West Canaanite, Ugaritic, and Amorite, as well as the languages derived from them, including Hebrew, Phoenician, and Moabite. With Aramaic, the Canaanite languages form the northwestern subgroup of the Semitic languages.

The Old West Canaanite (Old Canaanite) languages comprise a group of dialects of the early and middle second millennium B.C. attested in glosses in Accadian texts from Tell el-Amarna (Egypt), in Canaanite borrowings in the Egyptian language of the Hyksos period and later, and in inscriptions written in a Sinaitic-Palestinian alphabet (Sinai). Amorite is attested in proper names in Accadian texts dating from the first half of the second millennium B.C., and Moabite is attested in inscriptions from the ninth century B.C. found near the southeastern shore of the Dead Sea. The only living Canaanite language is Hebrew.


Shifman, I. Sh. Finikiiskii iazyk. Moscow, 1963.
D’iakonov, I. M. Iazyki drevnei Perednei Azii. Moscow, 1967.
Bauer, T. Die Ostkanaanáer. Leipzig, 1926.
Harris, Z. S. Development of the Canaanite Dialects. New Haven, Conn., 1939.
Garbini, G. Il semítico di nord-ovest. Naples, 1960.
Bohl, F. Die Sprache der Amarnabriefe. Leipzig, 1968.
References in periodicals archive ?
Grabbe: "Thus, one people who spoke the Canaanite language, who preserved Canaanite culture, and who carried on Canaanite traditions and literary forms was Israel.
Ancient texts show that Ugaritic scribes learned foreign languages and taught them in addition to giving special attention to their mother tongue, the Canaanite language.
I am pleased to see that the author does not consider Ugaritic a Canaanite language, since I have long favored this perspective, believing that Ugaritic shares more features with Arabic than many classifications would have us believe (the author seems unaware of my "Does Ugaritic Go with Arabic in Semitic Genealogical Sub-Classification?
Classifying the language of the inscription as the Philistine version of whatever Canaanite language the Philistines had adopted, as does Lema ire, [3] is of no help for such an hypothesis, for no known Canaanite language retained at this period either the nominative dual form or the productive dual (defined as the ability to express any common noun as singular, dual, and plural).
The studies of Tropper and Grabbe challenge these two notions directly, the first attempting to prove that Ugaritic is a Canaanite language, the second that "Israelite" is only a subset of "Canaanite.
They reflect the simplification and reduction of the consonant inventory in Canaanite/Phoenician and in Ugaritic, a Canaanite language in peripheral position in the northernmost area of its linguistic group.
Steiner), Phoenician and the Eastern Canaanite Languages (Stanislav Segert), Classical Arabic (Wolfdietrich Fischer), Sayhadic (Epigraphic South Arabian) (Leonid E.
Furthermore, Phoenician and Moabite are Canaanite languages.