Colonial Trade

Colonial Trade

 

trade between the imperialist states and the colonial and dependent countries; one of the forms of exploitation of the latter. Colonial trade originated in the period of great geographic discoveries (the mid-15th through the mid-17th century).

During the 17th and 18th centuries trade was usually regulated by noneconomic, administrative methods. Outright robbery coexisted with normative enactments that restricted the colonies’ commercial dealings with the outside world and consolidated the colonial companies’ monopoly rights over trade with the colonies. Colonial trade was one of the sources of the primitive accumulation of capital. Under these conditions, the chief components of colonial trade were the slave trade and the sale of poor-quality wares at high prices in the colonies. The outright pillage of the colonies, as well as the exploitation of the colonial countries by means of colonial trade, through which unequal exchange was effected, played a greater and greater role as large-scale capitalist industry developed. The colonies were gradually drawn into the world capitalist economy and turned into agricultural and raw material appendages of the capitalist countries, that is, into markets for their products and sources of raw materials for capitalist industry. Thus, 65 times more cotton cloth was exported to India in 1835 than in 1814. In 1860, British weavers exported twice as much cloth to India than to Europe and the USA.

During the period of imperialism, the conditions for colonial trade were secured primarily by the military-political suppression of the colonial and dependent countries. Administrative methods of regulating colonial trade were combined with such economic methods as imperial preferences, minimum customs duties or complete exemption from them, and favorable prices that often exceeded the world average. Quantitative restrictions (quotas) on imports from third countries and currency restrictions were applied, particularly after World War II (1939–15), for the purpose of isolating colonies from world trade. Unequal exchange and the less-than-equal status of the colonial and dependent countries in the international capitalist division of labor remained characteristic features of colonial trade. During the period of imperialism colonial trade became one of the chief means by which the monopolies obtained monopolistic superprofits through the exploitation of colonial peoples. Colonial trade strengthened the customs union (an outgrowth of the colonial empires), ensured the leading role of the metropolitan country in the commercial turnover of its colonial possessions, and consolidated the backwardness and monocultural specialization of the colonies. The exports of the colonies were dominated by two or three goods essential to the imperialist countries, whereas their imports were dominated by a broad range of industrial goods and even foodstuffs. This retarded the development of local production in the colonies.

Since the collapse of the colonial system of imperialism, colonial trade has been transformed. The newly independent countries are seeking the abolition of the most one-sided conditions of colonial trade, expanding their mutual trade, and developing mutually advantageous, equal ties with socialist states. They are creating national firms for foreign trade and instituting state monopolies on the import of certain goods, in order to protect the national economy against foreign competition. There has been a noticeable decline in trade preferences favoring the former metropolitan country. In their struggle for equal status in foreign trade the developing countries meet the resistance of the imperialist states, which, applying neocolonialist methods, attempt to keep the former colonies within their spheres of influence. This is the purpose of state-monopoly regulation of foreign trade with the developing countries. In adapting to the new situation, the imperialist countries have been forced to make certain trade concessions in order to strengthen their position in the economies of the newly independent states. The principle of privileges carried over from the colonial period is an obstacle to the elimination of the colonial structure of the foreign trade of the new states. As long as they remain in the world capitalist economic system, the newly independent countries continue to be subject to exploitation by foreign monopoly capital in trade.

REFERENCES

Rymalov, V. V. Raspad kolonial’noi sistemy i mirovoe kapitalisticheskoe khoziaistvo. Moscow, 1966.
Obminskii, E. E. Torgovaia politika razvivaiushchikhsia stran. Moscow, 1967.

L. N. KRASAVINA

References in periodicals archive ?
Added to the UNESCO World Heritage list in 1999, the former French colonial trade port has been one of the most commercially vital towns in Viet Nam since the 16th century.
Read this very short summary of British colonial trade policy before 1900.
Mitchener and Weidenmier (2008) assess the impact of colonization on colonial trade flows by adding colonial status dummies to a standard gravity model.
'Kokonat over coconuts?' For centuries, coconuts were the 'tree of life,' but colonial trade transformed the industry into a lopsided extractive system sucking the sap of the local economy as farmers remain poor, producing only copra and earning P10,000 to P20,000 per hectare per year.
Grown in Jamaica and Honduras, mahogany was imported to Britain as part of a colonial trade network dominated by two commodities: sugar and human slaves.
In the 17th century, England and Holland fought actual wars for domination of European and colonial trade. In the 1930s, responding to the world economic slump, major trading countries tried to protect industries and jobs from competition by imposing steep tariffs and other restrictions on imports.
April 7-8 - Colonial Trade Faire and Musket Frolic, Fort de Chartres
legacy of Banister for colonial trade, subsequent generations of his family, and Rhode Island history.
If we do not include the dead animals in the museum, there are three chapters on the dramatic interactions between humans and animals: Chapter 2 on wild tigers in the nineteenth century; Fiona Tan's chapter on the colonial trade in exotic fauna; and Goh Hong Yi's chapter, which deals substantially with the modern illegal trade in wild animals and birds, to which the government long turned a blind eye.
The museum features the largest collection of 16th and 17th century Spanish colonial trade beads in the southern United States.
and "Trade with the said Indians shall be free and open to all." (21) As noted by Orford, "Colonial trade was enabled through government by unrepresentative assemblies under intimidation by powerful companies that had gained power and thus influence through commercial monopolies.
That commercial relationship speaks to the ambiguities of colonial trade in the Luso-Atlantic.