Copenhagen School

Also found in: Wikipedia.
The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.

Copenhagen School


(Lingvistkredsen, Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague), the scholars who make up the Linguistic Circle of Copenhagen, proponents of the glossematic theory— one of the schools of modern structural linguistics.

The circle was formed in 1931 by V. Br0ndal, H. Uldall, and L. Hjelmslev. Works by members of the circle are discussed at their meetings and published in the Bulletin du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague (since 1934) and in the journal Acta Linguistica (from 1939, edited by L. Hjelmslev and V. Br0ndal), known since 1966 as Acta Linguistica Hafniensia (edited by E. Fischer-J0rgensen). Since 1944 the circle has from time to time issued Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague.


Bulletin du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague, 1941–65, nos. 8–31.
Choix des communications et d”interventions au débat lors des séances tenues entre 1941 et 1965. Copenhagen, 1970.
The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
To tease out the relationships between childhood body size and the risk of RCC in adulthood, the team of researchers used data from the Copenhagen School Health Records Register (CSHRR).
Kjaer decided to be an architect at age 12, and, in 1951, attended the Copenhagen School of Interior Design (now the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts School of Design), where she was tutored by Danish Modern pioneer Finn Juhl.
The Copenhagen School Health Record Register (CSHRR) contains information on most of the children in Copenhagen who attended school during 1930-1989.
According to Copenhagen school of security studies, at present, security does not solely signify external military intimidations, rather economic threats, societal threats, political threats, and environmental threats also emanates under the umbrella of security/national security.
Infusing the book's narrative are concepts of the postmodernist critical security analysis' approach as championed by the Copenhagen School and applied by Buzan and Waever in their 1998 treatise Security: A New Framework for Analysis.
1-10) provides an initial outline of the book but also admits the author's dependence on the leading scholars that have come to be associated with the Copenhagen school. While numerous scholars are referenced in the introduction, Pfoh is clearly dependent on the works of T.
The argument will be built on the analytic framework of the Copenhagen School and on securitization and will highlight the relevance of previous works such as Philippe Bourbeau, The Securitization of Migration.
Cooper spent three months teaching and lecturing in Copenhagen Denmark at the Copenhagen School of Design & Technology (KEA.) Professor Cooper also is the recipient of the Chancellor's Award for Excellence in Faculty Service from the State University of New York which is presented to a faculty member for consistently superior service over multiple years.
The authors also borrow the "speech act" and "securitization" terms from the Copenhagen School.
That said, out of the diversified spectrum of theoretical frameworks, this article accommodates neoclassical realist understanding and the Copenhagen School in a comparative manner in one of the specified elements of the concept of security.
33-34), as the Copenhagen School claims, should this final sentence in the book be changed to read: "security concerns will develop by keeping pace with ways in which security is spoken"?

Full browser ?