Descriptive Linguistics


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia.
The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.

Descriptive Linguistics

 

one of the schools of linguistic structuralism, which was dominant in American linguistics from the 1930’s to the 1950’s. The American linguists L. Bloomfield and E. Sapir, who reexamined the ideas of the neogrammarian doctrine, were the founders of descriptive linguistics. The trends in descriptive linguistics—one associated with Bloomfield (the works of G. Trager, B. Bloch, Z. Harris, C. Hockett, and H. L. Smith, Jr.) and the other with Sapir (the works of K. L. Pike, E. A. Nida, and C. Fries)—diverge in the nature of their research interests and in part in their theoretical aims but are similar in the area of methods of linguistic research.

The limitation to problems of synchronic linguistic re-search is caused by linguistic practice (the teaching of language) and the specifics of the material from North American Indian languages. Language appears to descriptivists as an aggregate of speech utterances, which were the main object of their research. At the center of their attention were the rules of the scientific description (hence the name) of texts: the study of the organization, the arrangement and classification of their elements. The formalization of analytical procedures in the area of phonology and morphology (the development of principles for studying language at different levels, of distributive analysis, and of the method of immediate constitutents) led to the posing of general questions on linguistic simulation. Lack of attention to the content plane of language, as well as to the paradigmatic aspect of language, did not permit descriptivists sufficiently fully and correctly to interpret language as a system. There was also no consistent philosophical basis. The overcoming of descriptivism is connected with sharp criticism of its methodological basis (in particular, its underestimation of the explanatory aspects of science) from the viewpoint of the theory of the generative grammar of language.

REFERENCES

Sapir, E. Iazyk: Vvedenie v izuchenie rechi. Moscow, 1934. (Translated from English.)
Gleason, H. Vvedenie v deskriptivnuiu lingvistiku. Moscow, 1959. (Translated from English.)
Bloomfield, L. lazyk. Moscow, 1968. (Translated from English.)
Arutiunova, N. D., G. A. Klimov, and E. S. Kubriakova. “Amerikanskii strukturalizm.” In Osnovnye napravleniia strukturalizma. Moscow, 1964.
Readings in Linguistics, 4th ed. Edited by M. Joos. London-Chicago, 1967.

G. A. KLIMOV

The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
Any branch of applied linguistics depends essentially upon, but also raises interesting questions for, descriptive linguistics. Thus the future of forensic linguistics is inextricably linked to the development, by descriptive and in particular corpus linguists, of more sophisticated means of identifying and evaluating regularities in texts.
As a dynamic and attractive framework within theoretical and descriptive linguistics, it proves to be one of the most exciting areas of research within the interdisciplinary project of cognitive science.
Kirsten Malmkjaer: Descriptive Linguistics and Translation Studies: Interface and Differences.
This was different in certain directions of American descriptive linguistics under the influence of behaviourism, beginning with Bloomfield and still clearly visible today.
In addition to the core of Gurage descriptive linguistics, articles of this book present interesting historical and comparative aspects (such as on "a Proto-Semitic marker of the imperfect," "An archaic vowel of the jussive," "Archaic features in South Ethiopic," and "Traces of the laryngeals in Ennemor" and in Endegen), and themes of interest for general and theoretical linguistics (such as "Spirantization in the Ethiopian languages," "Frequency as determinant of linguistic changes in Ethiopic," and "The influence of the Cushitic substratum on Semitic Ethiopic reexamined").
Gleason's "older" Introduction to Descriptive Linguistics (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1961), or having them read V.
Readers are assumed to be familiar with the basic concepts and terminology of descriptive linguistics.

Full browser ?