nous

(redirected from Divine Mind)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical.

nous

Metaphysics mind or reason, esp when regarded as the principle governing all things
Collins Discovery Encyclopedia, 1st edition © HarperCollins Publishers 2005
The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.

Nous

 

one of the basic categories in classical philosophy, representing a generalization of all the laws of the meaning, reason, and thought that prevail in the universe and in man.

In ancient Greek natural philosophy (sixth to fifth centuries B.C.), nous is closely associated with the sensual and material cosmos. According to Democritus, nous is a “god in a globe of fire.” Epicharmus asserts that the sun is “wholly nous,” and Archelaus, that “god is air and nous.” During this period the most developed conception of nous was provided by Anax-agoras. With regard to nous in the human soul, Greek natural philosophy gradually made the transition from an undifferentiated understanding that equated nous with knowledge, opinions, and sensations in the soul to a conception that juxtaposed nous to the affective-volitional aspect of sensory perceptions and ideas, to the body (Democritus) and the eyes (Empedocles).

The idealistic conception of nous as the principle of world order and harmony was developed by Plato, who treated the relationship between nous and the universe dialectically. Aristotle believed that all the ideas of things form a world whole, or world nous, which is the form of forms and feeling of feelings—the actually thinking eternity in which every sensory thing has its idea. Aristotle thought that these ideas are eternally effective and constitute the eternal and immovable nous, which he called the prime mover. Thus, with the doctrine of the nous, Aristotle, rather than Plato, is the remote precursor of Neoplatonism.

The Stoics, who considered nous the divine principle or fate, treated it pantheistically as something fiery that penetrated everything, even the smallest parts of the universe. However, already in the second and first centuries B.C. the Platonic representatives of the Middle Stoa, Panaetius of Rhodes and Posidonius, ceased to regard nous as something material and fiery and transformed it into the world order, beginning with the pure and absolute nous and proceeding through all the stages of material being to natural phenomena and man. Numenius, who was close to Neoplatonism, viewed nous as a demiurge. One of Plotinus’ teachers, Ammonius Saccas (third century A.D.), clearly distinguished nous from everything spiritual and corporeal.

Plotinus (third century A.D.), who reworked the teachings of Anaxagoras, Plato, and Aristotle, developed the doctrine of nous as the eternally self-motioned relationship of Being to itself. In Plotinus’ works nous is distinguished from the One and from the “soul” and is characterized by the identity between subject and object. The luminous nature of nous was explained on the basis of Platonic concepts. Plotinus expounded a detailed doctrine about the inner ascent of man to the ultimate luminous concentration in nous and through nous to the concentration in the One.

The disciples and followers of Plotinus strove to differentiate and define precisely the subject-object relationship within nous. Proclus (fifth century A.D.) proposed a triadic division of nous: that which is thought and is, or the image; thinking ideas; and the synthesis of both, which is understood as life.

The classical theory of nous historically had enormous philosophical significance. It contributed to the creation of a unified concept of a cognized, lawlike principle juxtaposed to all that is accidental, chaotically transient, and empirical.

A. F. LOSEV

The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
(73.) Philosophy exhorts Boethius to raise human reason up to the divine mind (Consolatio V pr.
For example, Kepler's sphere is identified with the universe; the universe is further identified as the outpouring of the Divine Mind. Since in geometry the point is the origin of the line, circle and sphere, it therefore is identified metaphorically with God.
Therefore, creation is prior to Predestination--that is, in the divine mind, or the decree concerning the creation of man is prior to the decree of Predestination, and the act of creation is prior to the execution of the decree of Predestination.
It was sincerely believed that the human being (or, to be a little more explicit, the male human mind) was a finite copy of the infinite Divine Mind, and that the concepts through which we think are little copies of the unchanging Divine Ideas.
How can human thoughts and actions have freedom if the divine mind, in foreseeing all things, binds them?
Since God does not, strictly speaking, have foreknowledge of free actions, but knows them as eternally present in the divine mind, God's knowledge of them is consistent with their not being necessitated by the past.
He is careful to ensure that the divine mind does not simply take over the human functions.
But we can certainly conclude from the order in the universe that if we are prepared to see the universe as the creation of a divine mind, then that mind must be in comparison with ours, one of great subtlety and intelligence, remembering, of course, that all such comparisons are strictly relative to our perceptions and natures, and cannot give us any direct knowledge of the divine nature.
Rist, rather than concluding that Plato abandoned the notion of the Forms, sees this omission as an indication that Plato may have arrived at an identification of the Form of the Good and the Divine Mind. As Rist notes, in Plato's final work, the Laws, "the original at which we should not look is not, as in the Republic, the Form of the Good, but the Divine Mind." In the final chapter Rist proposes to show that Plato's views, with some revisions, can stand up to contemporary objections seeking to undermine the objectivity of morals.
Thus, the Jewish aim is an "elevating knowledge of the real" (154), a constant approximation to the divine mind without a hope of attaining it.