Emil Brunner


Also found in: Wikipedia.

Brunner, Emil

 

Born Dec. 23, 1889, in Winterthur; died Apr. 6, 1966, in Zürich. Swiss Protestant theologian. Professor in Zürich since 1924. Representative of dialectical theology.

Turning against 19th-century liberal Protestantism and reaffirming the fundamental principles of the Reformation of the 16th century, Brunner pitted belief and revelation against the spirit of positivistic scientific methods. He criticized 20th-century civilization, accusing it of a hypertrophy of technological interest and blaming it for the decay of the human spirit, which has lost god and is deserted in the world of things (see Christianity and Civilization, vol. 2, London, 1949). Brunner saw the present state of the world as a proof of its approaching end.

WORKS

Der Mensch im Widerspruch. Zürich, 1941.
Offenbarung und Vernunft. Zürich, 1941.
Das Ewige als Zukunft und Gegenwart. London, 1953.

REFERENCES

Baumer, F. L. “Apokaliptika 20-go stoletiia.” Vestnik istorii mirovoi kultury, 1957, no. 2.
Volken, L. Der Glaube bei E. Brunner. Freiburg, 1947.

S. S. AVERINTSEV

Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
adds significant nuance to this narrative by retrieving lines of argument from known but too often unread figures like Albrecht Ritschl, Max Reischle, and Emil Brunner.
In the confrontation with Emil Brunner, Barth's harsh rejection of natural theology can be seen for political reasons concerning National Socialism and German Christians.
He sees his work as a contribution to the legendary debate between the Reformed theologians Karl Barth and Emil Brunner over the question of natural theology.
Macintosh and Henry Nelson Wieman; the Word-oriented theologies of Karl Barth, Emil Brunner, Friedrich Gogarten, and Dietrich Bonhoeffer; the existential theologies of Gabriel Marcel, Paul Tillich, and Rudolf Bultmann; and the theologies of H.
There was and is a powerful neo-Reformationist offshoot of liberal theology, founded by Karl Barth and Emil Brunner, that sought to refigure the Reformationist dialectic of Word and Spirit as the basis of Christian claims.
Protestant theologians like Karl Barth, Emil Brunner, Oscar Cullman and Dietrich Bonhoeffer tried to recover the truth of Protestant theology and morality.
Emil Brunner wrote: "The sacraments are the divinely given flying buttresses that save the church from collapse; even the boldest has not dared to lay hands on the sacraments.
Karl Barth, Emil Brunner, and other leaders of last century's "neo-orthodoxy" see Schleiermacher as the headwater of a stream of culture-Protestantism, the progenitor of a theological movement that ended up accommodating itself to the culture around it and having no critical leverage against it.
Many twentieth-century theologians, heeding the advice of Karl Barth in the celebrated 1934 debate with Emil Brunner, rejected the natural-law tradition in favor of an ethic of divine command.
As the father of modern liberal theology, Friedrich Schleiermacher was sharply criticized in the first half of the twentieth century by the neo-orthodox theologian Emil Brunner for departing from the Reformation faith rooted in the centrality of scripture and preaching.
Early in the twentieth century, Emil Brunner noted, "The ecclesiastical doctrine of the Trinity, established by the dogma of the ancient Church, is not a Biblical kerygma, therefore it is not the kerygma of the Church, but it is a theological doctrine which defends the central faith of the Bible and of the Church.
Emil Brunner, CEO *** Company Name: Avance Logic Company Preview