Enlightened Absolutism

(redirected from Enlightened despotism)
Also found in: Dictionary, Wikipedia.

Enlightened Absolutism

 

in several European absolutist states in the second half of the 18th century, a policy that pursued the ideas of the Enlightenment. The policy of enlightened absolutism entailed the implementation of reforms that abolished the most obsolete feudal institutions and that sometimes resulted in progress toward the development of bourgeois society.

In the 18th century, many representatives of the Enlightenment, including Voltaire, advocated the idea of a state headed by an “enlightened monarch” who would be capable of transforming public life on the basis of new, rational principles. With the fragmentation of feudalism, the maturation of the capitalist structure, and the spread of Enlightenment ideas, even the European monarchs were forced to consider making reforms. In a number of countries, feudal monopolies and some of the privileges of certain social estates were abolished, and peasant reforms were carried out. Ecclesiastical reforms were implemented (the subordination of the church to the state, the secularization of church lands, the expulsion of the Jesuits, and the elimination of monastic orders). School instruction and court and legal proceedings were reformed, and there was progress toward religious toleration and the relaxation of censorship. State policies sometimes reflected the ideas of the Physiocrats.

Reforms in the spirit of enlightened absolutism were carried out in a number of countries, including Prussia (during the early reign of Frederick II), Austria (beginning with the reign of Maria Theresa, and especially during the reign of Joseph II), Spain (under Charles III and the Enlightenment thinkers and statesmen P. Abarco de Bolea [the count of Aranda], P. Campomanes, and J. Moñino de Floridablanca), and Portugal (under S. J. de Carvalho, the marquis of Pombal). Enlightened absolutism was also characteristic of Denmark (under the ministers A. Bernstorff and J. F. Struensee, as well as the regent, Prince Frederick), Sweden (Gustavus III), and Russia (Catherine II’s policies during the 1760’s).

Some of the reforms associated with enlightened absolutism contributed objectively to the development of the capitalist structure, but feudal despotism prevailed in the policies of the enlightened sovereigns. The incompatibility between Enlightenment principles and absolutist regimes was most sharply manifested in Prussia under Frederick II. When the feudal absolutist state undertook reforms that infringed on the interests of the nobility, and especially when the reforms assumed a distinctly bourgeois character (for example, A. R. J. Turgot’s reforms of 1774–76 in France), feudal circles expressed resolute opposition, and ultimately the reforms were not implemented.

In general, the policy of enlightened absolutism was successful only in countries where the bourgeoisie was in a comparatively early stage of development. Even in these countries, the period of enlightened absolutism was brief. With the collapse of the feudal absolutist system as a result of the French Revolution, European monarchs abandoned their “liberal” undertakings in the spirit of enlightened absolutism. Almost everywhere the policy of enlightened absolutism gave way to open feudal reaction. In Russia the turning point was the suppression of the Peasant War under the leadership of E. I. Pugachev (1773–75).

REFERENCES

Mittenzwei, J. “Über das Problem des aufgeklärten Absolutismus.” Zeitschrift fur Geschichtswissenschaft, 1970, no. 9.
Druzhinin, N. M. “Prosveshchennyi absoliutizm v Rossii.” In the collection Absoliutizm v Rossii (XVII-XVIII vv.). Moscow, 1964.
References in periodicals archive ?
When stripped of its "mythology," the early modern state tha t emerges from this recent literature is one that generally is not despotic, arbitrary, or autocratic, even in the period of "Enlightened Despotism." In spite of the rhetoric and imagery of 'absolutism,' institutional prerogatives, customs, and law, even criminal law, constrained state power, and the monarch was expected to and largely did respect the rights of his subjects.
We may indeed be restoring a sort of enlightened despotism of a technologically neo-positivistic type, a realm of experts whose `know-how' is but another term for `doing without knowing'.
But his enlightened despotism troubles enlightened democrats.
The first period is from Poltava to the Congress of Vienna in 1814-15, when Russia appeared in the guise of benign "Enlightened despotism." The second begins with Alexander I's Holy Alliance through the unbending autocrat Nicholas I, seen by the West as the "gendarme of Europe." The third phase begins with the Great Reforms of Alexander II, and closes by the fall of the Imperial Regime in 1917 when Russia is viewed as an integral part of Europe.
No, our sole hope is the enlightened despotism of actors.
Thereafter the author clarifies in broad terms the period of enlightened despotism that started with Peter the Great's westernization drive, followed, after a brief interlude, by Catherine the Great's reign, and concluded with young Alexander I's apogee, right up to the Congress of Vienna.
As Huang notes, the "irrational" element here is the faith that such an "enlightened despotism" was even possible.
Rather than the term "enlightened despotism," some authorities prefer the term "enlightened absolutism." The concept of the "despot" raises, for them, an image of individual rulers who act wantonly and arbitrarily, while they feel that "absolutist" rulers are those who, strictly speaking, are politically unrestricted but may feel bound by some sense of law and the rights and interests of individuals within their respective societies.(7) Furthermore, there is a need to appreciate the specific reference that the term "enlightened" raises.
Political eras as different as Europe's enlightened despotism and America's New Deal have been characterized as elite-led reform designed to stave off revolution.
Gagliardo, John G., Enlightened Despotism. New York, 1967.
Christopher Storrs argues that recent revisions to what constitutes "enlightened despotism" open the door to interpreting the late eighteenth-century Savoyard government in this now broad category.
The philosophers who were the intellectual fathers of the 1789 revolution longed not for democracy, but for enlightened despotism, which is what many French still look for when they elect a president.