Enlightened Absolutism

(redirected from Enlightened despots)

Enlightened Absolutism

 

in several European absolutist states in the second half of the 18th century, a policy that pursued the ideas of the Enlightenment. The policy of enlightened absolutism entailed the implementation of reforms that abolished the most obsolete feudal institutions and that sometimes resulted in progress toward the development of bourgeois society.

In the 18th century, many representatives of the Enlightenment, including Voltaire, advocated the idea of a state headed by an “enlightened monarch” who would be capable of transforming public life on the basis of new, rational principles. With the fragmentation of feudalism, the maturation of the capitalist structure, and the spread of Enlightenment ideas, even the European monarchs were forced to consider making reforms. In a number of countries, feudal monopolies and some of the privileges of certain social estates were abolished, and peasant reforms were carried out. Ecclesiastical reforms were implemented (the subordination of the church to the state, the secularization of church lands, the expulsion of the Jesuits, and the elimination of monastic orders). School instruction and court and legal proceedings were reformed, and there was progress toward religious toleration and the relaxation of censorship. State policies sometimes reflected the ideas of the Physiocrats.

Reforms in the spirit of enlightened absolutism were carried out in a number of countries, including Prussia (during the early reign of Frederick II), Austria (beginning with the reign of Maria Theresa, and especially during the reign of Joseph II), Spain (under Charles III and the Enlightenment thinkers and statesmen P. Abarco de Bolea [the count of Aranda], P. Campomanes, and J. Moñino de Floridablanca), and Portugal (under S. J. de Carvalho, the marquis of Pombal). Enlightened absolutism was also characteristic of Denmark (under the ministers A. Bernstorff and J. F. Struensee, as well as the regent, Prince Frederick), Sweden (Gustavus III), and Russia (Catherine II’s policies during the 1760’s).

Some of the reforms associated with enlightened absolutism contributed objectively to the development of the capitalist structure, but feudal despotism prevailed in the policies of the enlightened sovereigns. The incompatibility between Enlightenment principles and absolutist regimes was most sharply manifested in Prussia under Frederick II. When the feudal absolutist state undertook reforms that infringed on the interests of the nobility, and especially when the reforms assumed a distinctly bourgeois character (for example, A. R. J. Turgot’s reforms of 1774–76 in France), feudal circles expressed resolute opposition, and ultimately the reforms were not implemented.

In general, the policy of enlightened absolutism was successful only in countries where the bourgeoisie was in a comparatively early stage of development. Even in these countries, the period of enlightened absolutism was brief. With the collapse of the feudal absolutist system as a result of the French Revolution, European monarchs abandoned their “liberal” undertakings in the spirit of enlightened absolutism. Almost everywhere the policy of enlightened absolutism gave way to open feudal reaction. In Russia the turning point was the suppression of the Peasant War under the leadership of E. I. Pugachev (1773–75).

REFERENCES

Mittenzwei, J. “Über das Problem des aufgeklärten Absolutismus.” Zeitschrift fur Geschichtswissenschaft, 1970, no. 9.
Druzhinin, N. M. “Prosveshchennyi absoliutizm v Rossii.” In the collection Absoliutizm v Rossii (XVII-XVIII vv.). Moscow, 1964.
References in periodicals archive ?
His story involves comparisons between familiar characters in succeeding eras, paired along rationalist/ pluralist lines: from John Locke and more historically minded Whigs in the 17th century; through Voltaire as despiser of religion and admirer of enlightened despots and Montesquieu as opponent of royal absolutism and admirer of the estates in mid-18th-century France; to Thomas Paine and Edmund Burke during the era of the American and French revolutions; and culminating in the subtler 19th-century contrast of John Stuart Mill, for the rationalists, with his friend Alexis de Tocqueville, for pluralism.
Elsewhere in Europe this was the time of the so-called enlightened despots: Frederick II in Prussia and Catherine II in Russia.
Recounting Gilibert's years in Poland, Gutton evokes the disappointments of philosophes called to serve enlightened despots.
The traditions of Muscovy grew strong during the formation of the Russian empire, and Russian identity remained largely unscathed through the revolutionary reforms of Peter the Great and other enlightened despots.
Yet drawing on wide-ranging investigations of original documents (cited in the extensive bibliography and notes), he finds that local factors were significant in shaping imperial policy on the ground: "Spain's enlightened despots, operating from the empire's peninsular center and possessed of unprecedented regal power, did not so much dictate policies as negotiate them in ongoing dialogues with their own colonial subjects" (9).
Two hundred years earlier, when humanity was still earthbound, the conjunction of reason, aesthetics and politics found an altogether more constructive harmony with the Enlightened Despots (page 9); and another, with quite different tone and political impact, in the study of nature across the Anglophone world in the nineteenth century (page 18).
wanted its friends to stay solidly in place as enlightened despots, but Arab populations (not to mention the Iranians in 1979) naturally saw reform as an invitation to oust their leaders--even if what came afterward was often far worse.
The author tells us, for example, that "[t]he reforms of the enlightened despots of the state were carried out by veritable criminals" (182).
The last of the Enlightened Despots, Napoleon sought to extend and apply Enlightenment values to the areas he conquered.
Rather, they thought the future lay with what they called "enlightened despots," such as Empress Catherine of Russia or Joseph II of the Habsburg empire.
The "enlightened despots" of the Habsburgs during the Enlightenment similarly share in the political, cultural and intellectual climate of all Europe, particularly regarding their attitudes towards the masses of Central Europe still locked in serfdom, even as United States was engaged in its war of independence.
Thus it is interesting to compare these two important political figures and consider which (if either) one of them best merits the historical title of "last" of the "enlightened despots."