(redirected from Enterprise liability)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Financial, Wikipedia.


in law, an obligation of one party to another, usually to compensate financially. It is a fundamental aspect of torttort,
in law, the violation of some duty clearly set by law, not by a specific agreement between two parties, as in breach of contract. When such a duty is breached, the injured party has the right to institute suit for compensatory damages.
..... Click the link for more information.
 law, although liability may also arise from duties entered into by special agreement, as in a contractcontract,
in law, a promise, enforceable by law, to perform or to refrain from performing some specified act. In a general sense, all civil obligations fall under tort or contract law.
..... Click the link for more information.
 or in the carrying out of a fiduciaryfiduciary
, in law, a person who is obliged to discharge faithfully a responsibility of trust toward another. Among the common fiduciary relationships are guardian to ward, parent to child, lawyer to client, corporate director to corporation, trustee to trust, and business
..... Click the link for more information.
 duty. Liability is not always the result of an intentionally damaging act or of some proven fault like negligencenegligence,
in law, especially tort law, the breach of an obligation (duty) to act with care, or the failure to act as a reasonable and prudent person would under similar circumstances.
..... Click the link for more information.
. The affixing of liability may once have been simply a peace-preserving alternative to the practice of an injured party taking vengeance. Further, the law's emphasis has long been that one who is able to pay (who, in modern terms, has "deep pockets") should pay one who has lost something through an action of the payer, even if that action was blameless.

Vicarious liability is the duty of a principal, e.g., an employer, to pay for losses occasioned by the acts of an agent, e.g., an employee. Strict liability, under which those engaging in certain undertakings (e.g., such "ultrahazardous" practices as the industrial use of high explosives) are held responsible for injury without inquiry into fault, has been increasingly imposed by courts and by statute in the 19th and 20th cent. One response has been the growth of the liability insurance industry, offering such coverage as physicians' malpracticemalpractice,
failure to provide professional services with the skill usually exhibited by responsible and careful members of the profession, resulting in injury, loss, or damage to the party contracting those services.
..... Click the link for more information.
 insurance. An area that has been the focus of much litigation, legislation, and debate in recent decades is product liability, under which heavy strict liability costs have been imposed on makers of such varied items as foods, drugs, cosmetics, and automobiles.

References in periodicals archive ?
There are several reasons to believe that hospital enterprise liability would add a powerful and beneficial deterrent effect.
Enterprise liability would give hospitals a reason to identify the instances in which this is most likely to occur, to adopt appropriate algorithms, and to weather the pushback of individual physicians who are reluctant to yield authority to their peers
Although the effects of enterprise liability are empirically and
prosecutors to dictate the scope of enterprise liability.
Enterprise liability distributes the costs of non-negligent accidents through injurers across those who benefit from the underlying risks.
The fairness case for enterprise liability is not fully captured by the statement that it distributes the costs of accidents across those who benefit from the underlying risks.
These strong forms of enterprise liability are probably premature, however.
Insurance premiums would be expensive and difficult to calculate due to increased liability caused by including physician affiliates under the enterprise liability theory.
Mello & Studdert, supra note 27, at 618 (in advocating enterprise liability, stating that "tort deterrence is best targeted at the institutional, not individual, level in medical malpractice law"); Peters, supra note 123, at 278-86 (advocating enterprise liability over health courts as the solution to the medical malpractice issue).
could be rebutted through the doctrines of enterprise liability and
This enterprise liability will only increase as social networking and Web 2.

Full browser ?