Ex Parte Milligan

Also found in: Legal, Wikipedia.

Milligan, ex parte,

case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1866. By authorization of Congress, President Lincoln in 1863 suspended the writ of habeas corpushabeas corpus
[Lat.,=you should have the body], writ directed by a judge to some person who is detaining another, commanding him to bring the body of the person in his custody at a specified time to a specified place for a specified purpose.
..... Click the link for more information.
 in cases where military officers held persons for offenses against the armed services. Army authorities had arrested Lambdin Milligan, a civilian who was involved in Copperhead, or pro-Confederate, activities in Indiana, and in 1864 he was tried by a military commission, convicted of fomenting rebellion, and condemned to death. The Supreme Court did not deal directly with the question of habeas corpus but with the limitation of martial law. It held that civilians might be tried by a military tribunal only where civil courts could not function because of invasion or disorder. It decided that even though the United States was at war, the federal courts of Indiana were operating, and they alone might try the case.


See S. Klaus, ed., The Milligan Case (1929, repr. 1970); D. Kelley, Milligan's Fight Against Lincoln (1973).

Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
Some might argue that the Supreme Court resolved this debate in 1866 when it decided Ex parte Milligan.
Territory The "Quasi War" with France and the War of 1812 The Civil War Ex Parte Milligan Other "Insurrections"--Moyer v.
In Ex Parte Milligan, the Court ruled that Lambdin P.
In 1866, Lincoln's policy suffered "strong rebukes" in Ex Parte Milligan, a Supreme Court decision that found military trial of civilians where civil courts are open to be unconstitutional (87).
The Supreme Court finally issued a clear ruling on military commissions in the case of Ex Parte Milligan in 1866, which was a full-blown rebuke of the pretended authority of the President to deny Americans a trial by jury during a time of conflict.
If they deal with legal issues at all, most Lincoln biographies and general histories of the Civil War era focus on the president's suspension of the writ of habeas corpus and the resulting litigation in Ex parte Merryman, Ex parte Vallandigham, and Ex parte Milligan.
The conspirators were tried in military tribunals, but rebel leaders again found reprieve--this time in the Supreme Court, which, in Ex parte Milligan (1866), held that citizens must be tried in civilian courts, so long as the latter continued to function (as they had).
39) They framed the requirement this way to avoid the Quirin and Hamdi precedents, which did not involve residents of the United States, while at the same time going beyond the famous Civil War-era decision Ex parte Milligan, (40) which, while limiting the military's detention and trial authority, involved only U.
In order to assess the lawfulness of their detentions, it also analyzes the legal precedents the Bush administration cited in support of their detention; Ex parte Milligan, the 1866 Supreme Court case concerning the inadmissibility of suspending habeas corpus where civil courts are still in operation; and the legislative history of Congress's authorization of force in the "War on Terror.
However, in the case Ex Parte Milligan (1866), the U.
1861) (civilian "prisoner of state"); Exparte Vallandigham, 68 US 243 (1863) (civilian); Ex Parte Milligan, 71 US 2 (1866) (civilian); Ex Parte Quirin, 317 US 1 (1942) (German "enemy combatants"); Application of Yamashita, 327 US 1 (1946) ("enemy combatant"); Johnson v.
O'Connor noted a Lincoln-era precedent, Ex parte Milligan, that declared unconstitutional the president's suspension of habeas corpus and the continued detention of an Indiana resident, Lamdin P.