Ex Parte Milligan

Also found in: Legal, Wikipedia.

Milligan, ex parte,

case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1866. By authorization of Congress, President Lincoln in 1863 suspended the writ of habeas corpushabeas corpus
[Lat.,=you should have the body], writ directed by a judge to some person who is detaining another, commanding him to bring the body of the person in his custody at a specified time to a specified place for a specified purpose.
..... Click the link for more information.
 in cases where military officers held persons for offenses against the armed services. Army authorities had arrested Lambdin Milligan, a civilian who was involved in Copperhead, or pro-Confederate, activities in Indiana, and in 1864 he was tried by a military commission, convicted of fomenting rebellion, and condemned to death. The Supreme Court did not deal directly with the question of habeas corpus but with the limitation of martial law. It held that civilians might be tried by a military tribunal only where civil courts could not function because of invasion or disorder. It decided that even though the United States was at war, the federal courts of Indiana were operating, and they alone might try the case.


See S. Klaus, ed., The Milligan Case (1929, repr. 1970); D. Kelley, Milligan's Fight Against Lincoln (1973).

The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia™ Copyright © 2013, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
Ex parte Milligan (US Supreme Court, 1866) rejected this extreme definition: 'when war exists...
Some might argue that the Supreme Court resolved this debate in 1866 when it decided Ex parte Milligan. (130) In Milligan, the Court ruled that military commissions lacked the jurisdiction to try U.S.
Territory The "Quasi War" with France and the War of 1812 The Civil War Ex Parte Milligan Other "Insurrections"--Moyer v.
In Ex Parte Milligan, the Court ruled that Lambdin P.
In 1866, Lincoln's policy suffered "strong rebukes" in Ex Parte Milligan, a Supreme Court decision that found military trial of civilians where civil courts are open to be unconstitutional (87).
Constitution in the 1866 case Ex Parte Milligan. Milligan was an Indiana resident accused of trying to steal arms and liberate Confederate prisoner-of-war camps during the Civil War (and condemned to death by a military commission).
If they deal with legal issues at all, most Lincoln biographies and general histories of the Civil War era focus on the president's suspension of the writ of habeas corpus and the resulting litigation in Ex parte Merryman, Ex parte Vallandigham, and Ex parte Milligan. McGinty covers these cases thoroughly, but he correctly points out that the single Supreme Court case with the greatest potential impact on the Union war effort was the decision in the Prize Cases.
The conspirators were tried in military tribunals, but rebel leaders again found reprieve--this time in the Supreme Court, which, in Ex parte Milligan (1866), held that citizens must be tried in civilian courts, so long as the latter continued to function (as they had).
Bradley, The Story of Ex parte Milligan: Military Trials, Enemy Combatants, and Congressional Authorization, in PRESIDENTIAL POWER STORIES 93, 123-24 (Christopher H.
In order to assess the lawfulness of their detentions, it also analyzes the legal precedents the Bush administration cited in support of their detention; Ex parte Milligan, the 1866 Supreme Court case concerning the inadmissibility of suspending habeas corpus where civil courts are still in operation; and the legislative history of Congress's authorization of force in the "War on Terror."
However, in the case Ex Parte Milligan (1866), the U.S.
Supreme Court case of ex parte Milligan. And during the Korean conflict, a former soldier in Korea could not be abducted from his civilian life in Ohio and spirited back to Korea to face military charges there.