F. W. de Klerk


Also found in: Dictionary.

de Klerk, F. W.

de Klerk, F. W. (Frederik Willem de Klerk) (frĕdˈərĭk vĭlˈəm də klûrkˈ), 1936–2021, South African statesman, president of South Africa (1989–94), b. Johannesburg, Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education (B.A., LL.B., 1958). De Klerk was born into a political family; his father had served as a minister in three administrations and his uncle, Hans Strijdom, had served as the country's prime minister (1954-58). Holding ministerial posts from 1978, he became (1989) acting president when P. W. Botha resigned. Recognizing that black resistance to the white power monopoly would only increase, de Klerk, despite his conservative reputation, began the process of ending apartheid, lifting the ban on antiapartheid parties and releasing Nelson Mandela from prison in 1990. In 1991 he obtained the repeal of all remaining apartheid laws and called for the drafting of a new constitution, leading to the approval of a multiracial transitional government in 1993. De Klerk and Mandela were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize for Peace in 1993. Mandela succeeded de Klerk as president in 1994, and de Klerk became one of two vice presidents in a government of national unity. Two years later the National Party withdrew from the government to form an official opposition, and in 1997 De Klerk retired from politics. After his retirement, he founded the FW de Klerk Foundation (2000) to promote world peace.

Bibliography

See his autobiographical The Last Trek (1999); The Other Man: F.W. de Klerk and the End of Apartheid (documentary film, 2015).

The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia™ Copyright © 2022, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
Botha's successor, F. W. de Klerk, met Mandela on 13 December 1989.
The longest poem in the collection amusingly imagines F. W. de Klerk presenting himself before Saint Peter for admission into heaven.
He examines the backgrounds of Nelson Mandela and F. W. de Klerk and illustrates the extent to which their personalities influenced the positions they took within their respective parties on a variety of issues.